Chopping and changing the system does rugby league no favours and whilst I think we should be innovative another change will make us look like we do not know what we are doing!

As mentioned take WBA in the Premier League. Come Feb/March this year they had hit the 40 point mark and literally had nothing else to play for, and the Premier League is the dogs whatsits according to many.

The super 8's as a Hull fan was boring in 2015 when we qualified but had zero chance of making the top 4. We decided to blood youngsters and the likes of Logan, Fash, Turget and Matongo all made their debuts. Two years later they are super league ready which probably played a part in this?

I personally still think that the points should be wiped and the top 4 start on 4,3,2,1 points dependant on league placings giving every team a real incentive.

Warrington,Wigan,Saints,Widnes and Leigh in the elite league. Then sod the biased Yorkshire teams.lol

Isn't that this seasons "qualifiers"

Hardest physical lol. It's not in the top 5. Rugby league has been soft for years

Regards

King James

please name the sports above RL and then make a reasoned argument on each to justify your selections.
I'll give you a helping hand, outright injury numbers doesn't automatcially make a sport 'more' physical.
Crack on sonshine.

Quote: knockersbumpMKII "please name the sports above RL and then make a reasoned argument on each to justify your selections. I'll give you a helping hand, outright injury numbers doesn't automatcially make a sport 'more' physical. Crack on sonshine.'" "King Dildo", really? Interesting, as you normally moan about being on the end of "abuse" and insults on the FC board for what you describe as voicing your opinion. Does that make you a hypocrite? viewtopic.php?f=34&p=18543317 retro.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f ... 3&start=50

Quote: knockersbumpMKII "please name the sports above RL and then make a reasoned argument on each to justify your selections. I'll give you a helping hand, outright injury numbers doesn't automatcially make a sport 'more' physical. Crack on sonshine.'" "King Dildo", really? Interesting, as you normally moan about being on the end of "abuse" and insults on the FC board for what you describe as voicing your opinion. Does that make you a hypocrite? viewtopic.php?f=34&p=18543317 retro.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f ... 3&start=50

Think you forgot someone .............

Fourteen teams. Top 8 go into a play-off scenario, with more reward for finishing higher. Bottom 6 go into middle 8's with top two of Championship. Bottom two out.

Why are you so Angry all the time?

Regards

King James

The bloke has serious issues.

I'd be going the other way - reduce the league by a team or two, replace the joke that is Magic Weekend with a nines tournament backed by a big sponsor. There just isn't enough quality in the game to support 14 clubs and the players are playing too many matches as it is. No wonder the Aussies are always able to go up a gear when they play us - they're even complaining they're playing too many games!

Nines? What's the obsession?

No way would a big sponsor back it. Someone like bachelors maybe but until we get the game into the commonwealth/Olympics forget it.

Plus we have already had a tried/tested/failed Nines for a couple of years 2008/9 and that didn't last long