Because I didn't claim there was no gloating. That was something you made up.

I've posted my quote, and it makes no reference to an absence of gloating - it points out that the objection to Stuarts behaviour is not motivated purely by who he coaches. There is an objection to that sort of behaviour from a coach [ifull stop[/i.

sorry but thats a load of BS.

if you dont want to admit you are wrong thats fine enough with me.

It's not - and anyone who cares to read my comments will see that it's something you've simply [imade up[/i.

Please quote exactly where I said there was no gloating.

dally messenger wrote

This is you making things up again, and hoping people won't notice. It's a strange tactic, particularly as people can simply read the thread.

This doesn't make sense, and it certainly doesn't quote where I said there was no gloating.

You're not quoting me saying that because I did not say it - you made it up.

how can i have made something up which a person has admitted to doing.

Because I didn't say there was no gloating, so whether someone admits to doing so is irrelevant to your claims regarding what I said.

All you have to do is quote my post where I said there was no gloating.

just repeating myself mate.

just go with liar liar pants on fire, it saves time

Yes, because you can't quote where I said what you claim I've said. You can't do it because you [imade it up[/i.

You never cease to amaze with your alternate reality (population: 1).

Seems to be a recurring theme this, that when people try and converse with Dally, we all end up wondering what we are discussing because rather than answer a question and show himself up that hes wrong, he will just dodge it and come back with something totally irrelevant and add a laughing smily to it.

That's because everyone else but him is a Rugby Union fan.