You must be referring to the touch judges.

Doctor and a ref now?

For me it was red(I didn't see last night's incident, so can't compare., I also though Wynne first try was Ok.

These things happen.

Even in defeat I was happy with the effort and how we played.

Ruck was poor for both teams, but I thought they got the majority of the pens.

Plus my point was, even if that try was give and I think it should, we could have still won the game.

Catalans lose again....

Guessing you lost.

And i dont think any poster on here needs to be told twice when you put numbers in your posts, unless your showing off your writing skills now you have learned how to spell numerical values.

Well, I for one am happy with the officials today. This is karma as they have both shafted us many times in the past.

away from the reffing controversy, and i agree it was a dodgy obstruction decision but they have happened to us at times too, it was a great performance by a hull fc side shorn of 5 props, 2 back rowers starting in the front row, 2 players on debut and a young lad making his second appearance. add in a masterclass by Sneyd and there's some good signs for hull to build on

Neither team can touch the ball until it's gone 10m.

Also, it's the ball that has to travel 10 - nowt to do with where his feet were. Dumbest play of the night.

The phantom obstruction in the disallowed Dragons try was an absolute joke from the VR.

Shocking display by the ref but you wouldn't care if your team had been served up the 2 points. 4 Hull tries came off forward passes and the Cats disallowed one was as bad a decision as iv seen in a long time. Williames back foot was inside his own 40 and that decision again was poor. Also Sky seem to think only FC have injuries? How did Ellis not get done for his headshot on Bird? End of the day it's 2 point for Hull and sets up Friday nicely if nothing else.Hopefully they have had their luck today and we get a ref who is not heavily favouring Radfords Ram Raiders.

challenge cup final 1970 for me. hepworth gets away with a shocking foul on tyrer - probably decided the game

Despite your grievance, I hope you will be consistent, and post the highlights of the game ASAP for those who were unfortunate not to be able to see the game today.

It was the correct ruling. The ball has to go 10 metres before any player can touch it- it’s an awful ruling though- thing is with that kick if he hadn’t caught it the trajectory of the ball would probably have taken it 10 metres.