Unfortunately, this is the attitude which will only see this venture fail. As a supporter of a club who pays the players wages though, you are well within your rights to feel like this.

My concern would be that it turns into the situation England football have with friendlies. Clubs will see this as an opportunity to allow star players to recover from the inevitable 'knocks' they routinely carry through club games, so many would play for their clubs the previous Sunday, pick up a minor muscle injury and be running around again the week following the 'All Stars' game.
And as I presume the game would not be recognised as a full international, players would not even recieve a 'cap' and the game would technically be 'non-competative'?

Could this not be incorporated into say a 3 week mid season break? With this game played on the Wed of the middle week to give these players a weeks "camp" before the game to prepare, then well over a week after the game to recover.

it is a nice 'fantasy rugby' even t. It would be better with some kind of club split but its a nice event. Thats all. It should complementing international football, not replacing it.

in friendlies. Strangely in friendlies Catalans seem to have a lot of injured players who cant play for france.

Our last competitive game against france was 34-12.

A trii-nations mid-season tournament between England, Wales, and France would do everything we need. two, likely three games, More likely to see players like Carvell sticking with Wales and France do compete when in a competitive match. Rather than when we deign to hand them a friendly

We scored 60 points, so not exactly playing tricks, but it is close enough!

There won't be an much of an improvement in France (or Wales) until they have enough full times players to make a squad. We will always convincingly beat them until this happens. There's not much point in playing a team in a "test" if they can't keep up with us. This test has NEVER had a close score, and never will until France get at least a second SL team to add numbers to the squad.

People keep talking down this new initiative in time honoured RL tradition as well before it's even been tried.

But it isn't improving us. That's the point.

Basically, we have a choice here of helping our international partners out by playing them in games of low-calibre that they inevitably get stuffed in and we get next to nothing out of...

Or we help our own international team out by getting them a more competitive game that will probably get more media attention because it isn't a foregone conclusion that we'll win and so will also probably get a bigger crowd, not to mention it will help the international team more in preparations.

If you do the latter, RL fans complain that we are sh*tting on the minnow nations.
If you do the former, RL fans complain that we will never be near the Aussies and Kiwis because we aren't tested.

Quite simply, RL fans will always find something to moan about. Give it a go before whinging about never being able to work. There is a good chance that it will work.

And will someone tell me what France get from playing England that they won't get from playing Wales (apart from a tonking!)? It's still a full international in front of a five-figure crowd in a game that will be competitive and a real grudge match to boot!

We aren't a charity. We can't drop our own plans for the sake of everyone else. We can't play everyone. That is fact. Just like there are only 14 licenses in SL, there are only so many places available at the top of the international ladder.


By getting more players playing full time in the SL so that they can actually field a full-time international team?

You can't argue that the reasons we can't catch the Aussies is because of internal coaching issues, etc. and then argue that France can't catch us because they won't play us. It's a combination of both. But France could play us every week of the year and won't ever beat us because they aren't all full-time. Whereas England would beat the Aussies and Kiwis a few times because we are full time, we just don't have the other systems in place. This is hopefully looking at addressing one of the many.


How were Wales benefiting exactly? They haven't been playing us mid-season?
They still get their shot (which they need to earn) in the 4N and the WC. But the mid-season test isn't doing much for France yet, and until they get more players it won't do. They're best playing Wales (who have no-one to play). It kills two problems at once then.

Will someone explain why it is better for the "international game" that France play England (and get stuffed as usual) and not Wales (which would be competitive)?

Can't wait for the next France-Wales match it should be an absolute belter!!

I think Wales beating France was not just one of the best things to happen to Welsh RL, but also French RL. It was the kick up the backside that France needed which said perform or you don't get to play with the big boys, you don't have a right to it.

The next match between these two will be brutal, I imagine. Just what is needed to bring both teams on. Yes, both nations need more professional players and resources etc etc, but I think pitting these two against each other regularly and forcing them to compete for the chance to play the big boys is what is needed. It'll certainly bring them both closer to England's standards a lot quicker than just letting them play England every year.

So why waste one of our limited international dates on a made up side?

They can do that now.

im not, you are. I dont think that a game against a mid-season contrived side will improve us for international competition. I think playing France is international competition. You seem to be arguing that playing against better teams mid-season will improve teams, but wont accept that a game against france does the same thing for them.

This mid-season game will in no way benefit us against the Aussies. Frankly it smacks of pandering. It seems like the action of someone looking for excuses because they dont have the answers. I we put in place the infrastructure we need, throughout the game, we will beat the Aussies. A mid-season game against a RoW x111 will have no influence on it. We would be better placed either playing actual international competition against france or Wales, or having a full on event, which is enjoyed for what it is.

They played at end of season. How bloody arrogant do you want to be? France and Wales, two nations we want to invest in the game and grow have to earn the right to play against England! Christ there are 5 nations with a fully pro side and you want to cast 2 of them aside because they dont meet your standards. France v England in their last competitive game was 34-12, Our last competitive game against Australia finished 34-14.

Our last three results against Aus, 34-14, 46-16, 52-4
Frances last three results against us 60-6 34-12 66-12

Lets just hope Australia dont show us the same lack of respect.

Because its international competition. Its the reason national teams exist.

spot on.

Hopefully it will have a vote system like the NRL all stars game with only 1 player per team allowed and the 2 captains of Wales and France along with Pat Richards due to his Man of Steel Status as automatic selections. Voting wise the team I would pick if it followed the NRL rules would be:

1. Greenshields
2. King
3. Howell
4. Isa
5. Richards (MOS)
6. Witt
7. Dobson
8. James (Wales captain)
9. Buderus
10. O'Meley
11. Hoffman
12. Elima (France captain)
13. O'Donnell

14. L'Estrange
15. Perry
16. Cashmere
17. Morrison

Totally 100% agree.

I this was Facebook, I'd be liking this by now