|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 20628 | Oldham |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2016 | Aug 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Rooster Booster="Rooster Booster"I still don't understand how a MOD is allowed to be so rude, call people names and suggest they are mental or simply lesser in intelligence than them.
Still. A fair TRY wasn't given. Andrew Johns called it right and was then not heard on telly for a while.'"
If that's aimed at me...he opened the door with the insults, granted it's childish but he's an admin, he can remove me if he so wishes.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 5039 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Slugger McBatt="Slugger McBatt"I am someone who gets angry when I think about that decision, but I have to say that the image you posted supports the no try decision.
There is no doubt that Hall's little finger touched one end of the ball when it was on the ground. The moving image you show, however, suggests that Hall's end of the ball was rising up and pushing against his finger rather than Hall applying downward pressure on it. The other tip of the ball might have been in the turf but there is a reasonable view that the pressure was against the finger from the ball rather than the downward pressure being applied by Hall's finger.
Add into that the on-field ruling, that there was no try, I am seeing the decision as a reasonable one. Or at least understandable.'"
Hall's hand is moving down to the ground. It's impossible for there not to be downward pressure.
|
|
|
|
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2018 | Mar 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Slugger McBatt="Slugger McBatt"I am someone who gets angry when I think about that decision, but I have to say that the image you posted supports the no try decision.
There is no doubt that Hall's little finger touched one end of the ball when it was on the ground. The moving image you show, however, suggests that Hall's end of the ball was rising up and pushing against his finger rather than Hall applying downward pressure on it. The other tip of the ball might have been in the turf but there is a reasonable view that the pressure was against the finger from the ball rather than the downward pressure being applied by Hall's finger.
Add into that the on-field ruling, that there was no try, I am seeing the decision as a reasonable one. Or at least understandable.'"
That post of yours is way too rational.
Consider yourself excommunicated by the Moonie Massive.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 7155 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Wire Yed="Wire Yed"If that's aimed at me...he opened the door with the insults, granted it's childish but he's an admin, he can remove me if he so wishes.'"
No Sir. Mugwump. It's really infantile behaviour. Moreso as it's from someone criticising other people's behaviour!!!
Admin. Sorry. Even worse then.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2681 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2017 | Jul 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| @England_RL: The referee for Saturday's match against @NZRL_Kiwis will be Phil Bentham with Henry Perenara as the video referee. #4Nations
I don't see why we can't just have a neutral ref?
|
|
|
|
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Slugger McBatt="Slugger McBatt"I am someone who gets angry when I think about that decision, but I have to say that the image you posted supports the no try decision.
There is no doubt that Hall's little finger touched one end of the ball when it was on the ground. The moving image you show, however, suggests that Hall's end of the ball was rising up and pushing against his finger rather than Hall applying downward pressure on it. The other tip of the ball might have been in the turf but there is a reasonable view that the pressure was against the finger from the ball rather than the downward pressure being applied by Hall's finger.
Add into that the on-field ruling, that there was no try, I am seeing the decision as a reasonable one. Or at least understandable.'" It is a reasonable description of the moment that Halls finger contacts the ball. But it actually highlights why the decision was so wrong. Pretty much every rolling ball (due to the shape of the ball) will likely result in part of the ball going up and part going down. There is nothing in the rules that gets close to stating that the pressure of Halls finger has to be great than that of the ball rising. It is an entirely invented criteria. He may as well have actually disallowed because Hall didn't celebrate. Yes it would be true, but it isn't part of the criteria for a try.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14845 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2021 | Jul 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| To me it was no try BUT the apparent rationale given at the time smacked of looking for an excuse not to give it. That's what needs to be questioned and investigated - was that decision made fairly (even if they got it right by default)?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 10000 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Nov 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Dally="Dally"Look at it relative to the "O" on the advert - it's pushed forward and so knocked on (ie as I said before no "control" in the touch down).'"
You do realise that is because the camera is moving forward, not the ball...?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 17181 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Hall's finger/s never leave contact with the ball, so it is irrelevant whether the ball is rising at any stage. At the time I thought it was a try but at no stage did I think the VR would have the balls to give it. When he gave no try I was completely unmoved, but the injustice is burning more & more as time goes by & I keep thinking about it. I have spent a fortune following tours down under, I was in Melbourne in 92 when GB dicked the Aussies. The furore in the press against the ref the following week was unbelievable. Sufficient to say we were slaughtered by the ref in the decider at Brisbane.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 6858 | Leigh Centurions |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2019 | Nov 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Slugger McBatt="Slugger McBatt"I am someone who gets angry when I think about that decision, but I have to say that the image you posted supports the no try decision.
There is no doubt that Hall's little finger touched one end of the ball when it was on the ground. The moving image you show, however, suggests that Hall's end of the ball was rising up and pushing against his finger rather than Hall applying downward pressure on it. The other tip of the ball might have been in the turf but there is a reasonable view that the pressure was against the finger from the ball rather than the downward pressure being applied by Hall's finger.
Add into that the on-field ruling, that there was no try, I am seeing the decision as a reasonable one. Or at least understandable.'"
Well said.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 26 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2015 | Aug 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 5199 | Wakefield Trinity |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2014 | 11 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Slugger McBatt="Slugger McBatt"I am someone who gets angry when I think about that decision, but I have to say that the image you posted supports the no try decision.
There is no doubt that Hall's little finger touched one end of the ball when it was on the ground. The moving image you show, however, suggests that Hall's end of the ball was rising up and pushing against his finger rather than Hall applying downward pressure on it. The other tip of the ball might have been in the turf but there is a reasonable view that the pressure was against the finger from the ball rather than the downward pressure being applied by Hall's finger.
Add into that the on-field ruling, that there was no try, I am seeing the decision as a reasonable one. Or at least understandable.'"
All undone by the fact that Halls hand is travelling in a downward motion and at some considerable speed which means he's meeting the upward motion of that end of the ball with a downward force. TRY
|
|
|
 |
|