That's not how it works on this site.

used to be Police matter = not to be discussed.

I notice the AUP has gone.....?

Whys that then? And it's not a good look for a mod to be getting around the swear filter on the VT...

I don't think the present stage of his involvement with the police for his alleged crime would stop him working in many other jobs. Best to wait for the final outcome.

Btw ,we are desperate , Dan !

Indeed, so desparate Cullen saw to it a Hull FC playr got banned for Thursday.

Indeed, so desparate Cullen saw to it a Hull FC player got banned for Thursday.

Yes it would . In almost any other job in the public sector he would be put on gardening leave

In his situation there would have been 3 possible outcomes

1. Suspend him without pay show the club is very hostile to his actions but potentially unfair pending the enquiries

2/ let him play suggest the club do not wish to pass judgements on his actions the wire approach.

3/ stand him down pending the enquiries . Shows the club is not making a judgement but are concerned enough about his actions to take action.


In my view only 1 or 3 would have been acceptable.

I am disgusted by the actions of wire.

Has RLFans got a team of lawyers now?

One rule for one....

Compare wires actions with Huddersfield’s actions with Greg Johnson

The one aspect that does seems strange is that they stood him down in February but that he is now good to play.
Maybe their internal investigation has been concluded or maybe they are short of players ??

Warrington are not in the public sector so why have you used that comparison to strengthen your non argument. (Unless Moran has something to tell us). Public sector and public eye are two different things.
How would his employer have known he was arrested for an alleged domestic incident? Gelling is in the public eye, some clerk in the town hall isn't and as such it wouldn't be front page news in the local rag.

Bullshet.

No public sector employer would suspend someone without pay. That’s a disciplinary measure which would be saying the club have found him guilty. His solicitor would knock that down in seconds and quite rightly too.

If he’s done what’s been rumoured he’s a massive pillock and deserves punishment. But at the moment he’s innocent until proven guilty.

I don’t have any problem with Wire playing him until it’s decided either way by the judicial system.

It’s also a slippery slope to go down, is there a club without a player in their ranks who has been involved in some kind of violent incident off the pitch? I’d imagine most clubs do.

Considering nobody knows the full story, I don't see how a comment like this could be made. Surely the fact that he's now up for selection only goes in his favour.

Anyway I've reported your comment. As per the AUP, 3.2 Contributions must notPromote violence

Cheers

Correct! Now locked.