Said it last week and still stand by it. Wakey can only compete with the.top teams when the conditions are poor and it drags other teams down to their level

Trinity probably should have won then. Windy night, soft ground, which was the same as last week.
In fact, it was probably worse last night

after wanting to see professional fouls treated with a sin binning the first was one was produced for us last night, now lets see if they repeat it again in future matches

I see there's already the predictable thread on the Wakefield board blaming the ref for last night's loss.

Honestly, do Wakey EVER get beat fair and square?? Cas were comfortably the better side last night and deserved the points, nothing to do with the official. Wakefield offered very little in attack after half time, the better side won.

Not to mention a predictable post from a sad, lonely Widnes troll that still hasn't got over Trinity being significantly better than his side

Yes it's noticeable that you repeat yourself quite a lot

Who are you, Mystic chuffing Meg ??
Yes, Cas looked well up for the second half and yes, they would have very likely won the game.
However, the 12 points scored when Trinity went down to 12 men, plus the disruption of losing Arundel and Hampshire playing most of the game with a fractured cheekbone didn't help.

No question that Cas were the better side in the second half or, that Trinity had done well to go in at HT with a one point advantage, given the caning from Child, who seemed to lose the plot himself as the second half went on.
Some of the penalties given to Trinity in the last 5/10 minutes were a joke but I presume that he was trying to level up the penalty count

No I'm not Mystic Meg,I'm Realist bleeding Reggie!

The 12 points "gift" from the ref was the result of Wakey knowing full well that they couldn't compete and ended up being penalised.
The "gift" was your own inability to complete with a better team in the 2nd half.