i know exactly how the salary cap will affect leeds, the same way as the salary cap affects the clubs in australia,

the best players wont be playing this sport, they will be playing another, and every time a quality side is built it is dismantled immediately leading to a stagnation of the game with little evolution and a league like a politically correct sports day where everyone of mummys special little soldiers gets a turn at winning however good/bad they are

but for the time being and whilst there are such p1sspoor clubs in this league with such absolutely embarrassing youth development leeds will continue to only have to be at about 50% capacity to be one of the dominant sides, and if it wasnt meaning that the best british back prospect in a long time was playing ru next year and that as a sport we are still getting the third or fourth pick of the athletes this country produces id be happy for it to continue, under the sc we have competed in four of the last five gf and won three of them, im very happy with this, plus we are likely to compete in the next even though we have been very poor for most of the competition we are still in 2nd place and comfortably so,

but you know what, people are intelligent enough to see you change the argument when you get shown up, maybe its time for you to have another new username?

edited for accuracy

Since we applied:

New pitch
Increased capacity
Re-furbished floodlights
Re-furbished bar
New toilets

Still a way to go, but the club have done what they said they would do up to now.

Except he's talking someone who likes football as a second sport, not the other way around. RL is, has been and always will be my first choice sport.

hey sucked you in with a long and boring reply

too easy

We could only dream of the Golf Stand when we used to have to rough it with the 1,500 natives, back when HKR were e

fine win by wigan on the weekend ...

the salary cap is finally working ...

Perhaps this message board isn't loaded full of as many idiots as I thought. Maybe they're all just Dally.

Quote: rover49 "Since we applied The pitch was substantially improved in 2006, well before the licence application in 2008. In terms of claiming "the club has done what it said it would do up to now", unless it adds 3500 capacity before February, no it hasn't: "Super League side Hull KR have announced ambitious plans to expand their Craven Park stadium as part of their licence application. And in order to support their application, Rovers have outlined plans to increase their current stadium capacity to more than 14,000 by 2010." www.inthenews.co.uk/news/sport/r ... 216392.htm Well done on the toilets and the new bar carpet though.

Quote: rover49 "Since we applied The pitch was substantially improved in 2006, well before the licence application in 2008. In terms of claiming "the club has done what it said it would do up to now", unless it adds 3500 capacity before February, no it hasn't: "Super League side Hull KR have announced ambitious plans to expand their Craven Park stadium as part of their licence application. And in order to support their application, Rovers have outlined plans to increase their current stadium capacity to more than 14,000 by 2010." www.inthenews.co.uk/news/sport/r ... 216392.htm Well done on the toilets and the new bar carpet though.

\

enjoyed watching some of that game.

its good to see the salary cap doing its job.

the rise of huddersfield is a further example of what i referred to.

leeds have had some good times but now are beginning the slide that happens to top teams in the nrl.

if you are a real fan, you will support them through good times and bad

you see this is better dally, good work, using wigan and hudds as your examples, two clubs who have spent a fair bit of money from their respective owners as evidence, very contradictory, i like it,

thats a little more cerebral, but your delivery was lazy and obvious, better work, but you still have a long way to go

hull kr would have been a better example, you would have got more bites you see, and it wouldnt have been as obvious

using two fairly free spending clubs, propped up by their owners as examples of the sc working was too obvious

had you used a traditionally small club, which has acheived on the back of imports it would have been a little more disguised, because you have changed the argument from 'SC works here are two poor examples of clubs only able to suceed under the SC' to 'the SC works here is a good example of a club only able to suceed under an SC, but one which has needed to rely on imports, something we dont want'