Luke Walsh disagrees with you.

Luke Walsh hasn't seen it countless times on the replay.

I hope Leeds smash them

Alex murphy has tho

Whereas Phil Bentham does agree

Already a thread about this.

He doesn't need to say with absolute clarity it wasn't a successful kick. He has to make a decision on whether he thought it went over or not. There is no benefit of the doubt here. If he thinks it edged wide he has to say it missed. If he thinks it edged in he has to give it.

[iGoal Post(s) 10. For the purpose of judging a kick at goal, the goal posts are assumed to extend indefinitely upwards.
[/i

What Hudds try/no try wasn't worthy of needing a second look?

Right had to do a bit of housekeeping.

Don't you people actually read the boards before starting a post? Or is it ego that your opinion is so important you can't have it lost amongst the rabble? Jesus.

I'd say the second thing you said.

If nothing else it proves several things.
The video referee system is a joke and it is unfair to clubs in knockout games which are not televised.
There is a word called parallax. Two video views showed different things and the referee saw something from another position.
The referee made a decision on many aspects of the game and that is what he is there for.
Danny Brough should put the energy he puts into his vocal chords into his game.

The ball travels at such a speed so how do you know this? Are you sure he turned away before it went past the post? NO

To be honest I don't think the VR should be used for DG decisions for the same reasons they aren't used for forward pass calls. Behind the goal view looked fine, from the other end it looked no good.

Some have said if it's in line with the posts then it should be given......surely if it's in line it would hit them and bounce away? Too much doubt to give IMO.

Parallax schmallarax, it was clearly a DG from the rear view cam that happened to be dead in line (so issues of schmallarax don't enter into it) and any fair minded person viewing that shot KNOWS it was a DG and if they say different thrust are on the wind up.

The problem with judging a forward pass is that it is judged in relation to a moving player, the movement of the ball in relation to he moving player changes the direction the ball looks to move from the angle it is viewed.

With a drop goal, the view from behind the goal shows the ball on a trajectory going through the posts and it carries on on that path. It cannot do so and miss.