It's funny you would boast about being at wembley considering the draw you've had. Anyone in the top 8 would be at wembley with that draw.

You could say your appearence at wembley is down to circumstance.

Especially the semi final bye - another fix!

It's truly bemusing to see someone get a decision so wrong. I mean, how stupid do you have to be to award that try?

The forward pass that was given against Hull KR before the break was also a terrible call. That led to a wigan try nicely before HT, a 10 point swing.

Wigan were lucky to win. But I'm glad they did as it gives us a chance to go to 5th if we beat Catalan tomorrow

Isn't FlexWheeler a Leeds fan? If so he'll be at Headingley-West in early October.

No idea. And wtf is Headingley-West..?

I'm not surprised you don't know what it is. Being a Wigan fan you'll have little interest in what happens AFTER a playoff semi final.

If you think Wigan were the guilty party regarding holding down then your bias has finally fully consumed you.

You're weird, go away now please.

Classic Whino

As the middle of the ball is clearly NOT in touch, and as that part hits the ground first (because the ball is round) then any fair person who uses their brain to THINK about it must agree that the decision was correct. The arguments that claim the edge of the ball was on the line would be valid, if the ball was shaped as a shoe box. But it isn't.

Rubbish. You saw it, I saw it, everyone saw it apart from James Child. Stop being contrary. If that had been given against Bradford you would have gone on a 12 page rant.

I don't normally comment on here, too many one eyed clowns. I can see why, with the number of replays shown from behind, that it looks obvious that the ball was grounded on the touch in goal line. However as stated above the ball is not square and there is one camera angle that was only shown once that seems to show that the POINT of the ball which is in Charnley's hand actually hits the try line before the rest of the ball hits the side line. It was more of a 50/50 call than the so called Wigan biased sky muppets wanted to indicate. The biggest problem as far as reffing went was the consistent holding down by Hull KR. They were smarter at it than Wigan because they mostly did it without putting a hand on the ball.
I was surprised the kick off by KR that resulted in a drop out and try was not looked at in more detail. It seemed to me that Taylor touched it before Smith. But maybe theres no mileage in saying the favourites were hard done to. More fun for sky to promote the story that the plucky underdog was undone by bad luck.

Absolute rubbish. Stop making excuses for inexcusable reffing.

Are you James Childs?

I know one still image is not conclusive evidence. But even the most biased must see that this view shown only once by Sky does add a large degree of doubt. It is shown about 30 seconds in to the video ref review