FORUMS > The Virtual Terrace > The momentum rule versus forward passes |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7343 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | May 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Kosh "Sweet Baby Jeezus...
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7343 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | May 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: tb "Right. As the rules of the game clearly state. It's judged by its direction of travel relative to the passing player (and it's a basic fact of the 'real world' that all direction is relative to something).'"
Yes, and the position of the passing player is determined in relation to fixed ground markings, if this wasn't the case, like in the real world, direction would have little meaning.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 48326 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2023 | Oct 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Kelvin's Ferret "Yes, and the position of the passing player is determined in relation to fixed ground markings, '"
and?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 48326 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2023 | Oct 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Lost in Leeds "
Man running at 11m/s towards opponents line. '"
btw – that about a 9s 100m – he'd be coining it on the athletics circuit, not playing rugby league, if he could run at that pace
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 8893 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2024 | Apr 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Lost in Leeds "I'm gonna regret this and try and make as realistic to speeds of player and ball.
Man running at 11m/s towards opponents line. Passes ball as he crosses half way line at 30m/s laterally and 0.5m/s behind him. In 1 second, ball has travelled 30m laterally and 10.5m forward(11m/s forward and .5m backward). Receiver started on the 51m line catches the ball near opponents 40m line.
'"
That's only reaslistic if the player is Usain Bolt crossed with Wally Lewis and he's running in a vacuum.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 10000 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Nov 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Lost in Leeds "I'm gonna regret this and try and make as realistic to speeds of player and ball.
Man running at 11m/s towards opponents line. Passes ball as he crosses half way line at 30m/s laterally and 0.5m/s behind him. In 1 second, ball has travelled 30m laterally and 10.5m forward(11m/s forward and .5m backward). Receiver started on the 51m line catches the ball near opponents 40m line.
Is this a forward pass-
receiver started behind the thrower.
Ball is thrown back at 0.5m/s
Ball is caught 10.5m ahead of start location.
Using simple physics the answer is no, ref doesnt have time to do calculation so guesses the direction of players hands by using the marker lines as a reference , player scores out wide, everyone shouts forward pass, Stevo claims momentum rule.
I have used an extreme case which I have no doubt would result in the ref feeling obliged to call forward.'"
Apart from the speed of the player being totally unrealistic (even Usain couldn't pass a ball at that speed), we'll just go with this a second...
How far backwards and at what velocity would this player have to pass the ball in order for the laws of physics NOT to take the ball over the relative mark on the pitch which you would declare forward? I'm guessing pretty far and pretty fast!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7343 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | May 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: tb "wtf has that got to do with anything under discussion on this thread?'"
The point is that passing is the only part of the game I can think of where the actual direction of movement is not necessarily calculated as relative to fixed points on the ground, although the position of the players involved relative to those fixed positions is used to make a judgement about the direction the pass may travel in.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 4411 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2024 | Apr 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Kelvin's Ferret "The only true way of judging the direction the ball is propelled in is the direction it was actually propelled in after the fact, not some kind of half baked counterfactual whereby we make a guess at which direction it might be going to go based on the biomechanics of the player making the pass and then say that a guess will do regardless of what actually happens. The way it looks like it might go, is not the same as where it did go.
Everything on the pitch is relative to the ground as marked out by fixed markers like lines and flags, as long as a player is on the pitch their direction can and is judged relative to fixed lines. A player could not be judged onside or offside if we were not fixing position in some way relative to the ground, if it was simply a matter of position relative to another player then direction would be entirely meaningless within the operation of the game.'"
Lets try forgetting about biomechanics and counterfactuals for a second.
If you chuck a rugby ball backwards from the window of a moving train, the momentum of the train will cause it to land a good distance ahead of where you chucked it from. Relative to the ground, the ball has travelled a good distance forward, yet you chucked - shall we say [ipropelled[/i - the ball backwards.
The same thing happens when a moving rugby player passes a ball backwards to a supporting player. He throws it backwards to a guy behind him, but in relation to the ground it has gone forward. So according to your system, we should be blowing up for forward passes when somebody passes the ball backwards to somebody who is behind them.
Judgements for offside have nothing to do with it, as the momentum of two players has no bearing on their relative position at a given point in time.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 885 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2016 | Oct 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Many many years ago when I started watching the game, 63 years to be exact, the attacking line out covered nearly half the length of the field. If play was on the right handside halfway line the opposite winger in the line would be virtually on his own try line. Players were coached and taught to turn their bodies and pass not half a metre or even a metre backwards but 3 and 4 metres backwards.
This modern day game of flat lines and "flat" passes has brought about what is perceived to be unlimited forward passes but I still don't think that a referee watches the players hands every time a ball is passed. There is absolutely no way that he does that and therefore many blatant forward passes are missed by him.
What I find fascinating watching the SL on TV is how it is always the home fans who shout "forward" when it's the opposition in possession but never when their own team are in possession.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 229 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2019 | May 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Usain Bolt runs faster than that.
Surely you can appreciate the simple physics here. Bolt starts from 0m/s, allows for a minimum response time of circa 0.15 secs, allows for the time it takes to accelerate from 0m/s/ upto his flat out speed and bingo
|
|
|
|
|
|