The fact that it has chosen not to determine bouts by knock-outs would suggest otherwise but the fact that it qualifies under rule number one and partially qualifies under rule number two means I can give boxing dispension. Boxing is also not boring, unlike other games and pastimes that are played in long pants.

and cricket for that matter.

Ray French introduced the oxymoronic concept of the 'possible certain try'. Pure Colemanballs.

See Cod'ead's theory works.

Up there with Hemmings at the start of the 2nd half Wolves V cats: "it's a carbon copy of the first half - in reverse"

Bouts are determined by knock outs just ask khan and chisora
Many fights go to the judges but there is no other way to resolve a bout

Boxing is most definitely a sport, any suggestion otherwise is ludicrous

No change there then.

When's Ray French going to call it a day? The French and Davies combo, they're like a Granddad/Grandson combo. Gives me real earache.

I can't see what the fuss is about - a minor delay, no rugby was missed and an army of golf fans weren't left up in arms; good bit of juggling by the BBC.

That good work didn't continue in the commentary though - French and Davies are woeful and neither of them sounded like they had much of a clue what was going on, other than French constantly reminding us that one player or another is a 'powerful lad.'

I do like Clare Balding though - her jolly hockeysticks enthusiasm for the game is very infectious.

Lets turn this around...

The rugby is on before the Golf and overuns by going to extra time.... I'm pretty certain they would delay the start of the golf coverage.

No rugby was missed. Some people just moan for the sake of it.

Any game that takes five days to complete and has breaks so that the participants can have "lunch & tea" could never be classed as sport.

It's a i[is[/ied version of cricket, ergo not sport.