Good defense from both teams. Very very average attack from both teams except for the Briscoe try.

you didn't rate Penny's try then?

Don't really care what the rules say, Penny used his own player as a shield to run behind, for that reason the try should have been wiped. I don't think he'd have got anywhere close to scoring that without the indecision that was caused by his choice of running behind his own player. The rules might have changed, but I doubt any of the players on the pitch pay any attention to the different rule changes.

Really it shouldn't have been a try. Last week against Hull Cuthberton was penalised for running behind Briscoe in the 48th minute. Cummings agreed with that decision, and agreed with the decision this week. Bizarre given that the calls were different.

it was a perfectly good try every day of the week... jesus you are clutching at straws on that one

i watched the game as a neutral in the pub with no sound, and would be interested in the reasons for allowing the Ratchford try under the posts.

I thought the camera angle from behind clearly showed that the trajectory of the ball had changed and therefore Ratchford had handled it, which then means he had to ground it at the first contact with the ground, yet it seemed quite clear that there was daylight when the ball hit the turf and the first grounding came with the torso.

What was the video ref looking at?

From the various angles the VR took I don't think we ever saw the ball being grounded by Ratchford. Then with the last view they showed it seemed to definitely show the ball changing flight after hitting Ratchford's arm and hitting the ground.

Then the decision came up and it said Try.

My guess is that he was going for No Try and he hit the wrong button.

well you 'dont really care what the rules say'... so

Bless.

Did I miss something or when a bomb was put up to Ratchford at 12-0 and the ball bounced forward off him into the arms of a Warrington player why was the decision 'backwards'?!

Think we're seeing the result of this referee's on-field decision coming back to bite the VR in the Harris.

Why? If the ref says try and video shows otherwise then it's no try and vice versa.

Bentham gave a try, and the VR gave a try.

Whether it was a try or not, it makes no difference, both officials said it was a try and so it stood.

Couldn't give a rat's @rse to be honest, about time we got some of the 50/50 calls for a change.

Not a bad performance from a team which has had a sheeeite kicking game this year against a team that was unbeaten.

In all honesty, I think we had the rub of the green with decisions. I think we deserved to win by the intensity/desire we played with but there were a couple of 50/50s which changed the game. Our second try by Ratchford, for me, wasn't a try cos at no point did I see him connect with the ball properly with his hand.
Other questionable desicion was the up and under For the Leeds try. Was given as knockon from Leeds player, but for me, I thought it should have gone through.
These would have put Leeds back in, but credit the Wire defending.
Wire played really well. Westwood was the best man on the park- every drive
Took on The Leeds forwards and made huge yards. Some key changing
Moments were on the back of big hits and drives by Westwood.