|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 4699 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: BP1 "Those four loop fixtures are a knock on effect of finishing in the bottom four this year (two top-four sides plus two mid-four sides). We're continuing to pay the price for being so bad in 2024.
It's another obstacle we have to work through next year as we start the road back to respectability.'"
How are the loop fixtures arrived at, I'm assuming there is some sort of logic to it?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1116 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: scarrie "How are the loop fixtures arrived at, I'm assuming there is some sort of logic to it?'"
I'm not wholly sure. I know the league is split into three groups of four (top, middle, bottom) and you then play two games (one home, one away) from each of the two groups you're not in (hence our group of fixtures).
But I've no idea how those individual fixtures are arrived at. In our case, for example, why Wigan/Wire and not Salford/rovers, or Leigh/Cats and not Saints/Leeds?
Similarly, at magic we are allocated another bottom-four side, but I guess in that instance we were paired with Huddersfield so that Cas-Wakey could be the other one? Whether there is a definitive logic process to all this I don't know, this is rugby league after all!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 4699 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: BP1 "I'm not wholly sure. I know the league is split into three groups of four (top, middle, bottom) and you then play two games (one home, one away) from each of the two groups you're not in (hence our group of fixtures).
But I've no idea how those individual fixtures are arrived at. In our case, for example, why Wigan/Wire and not Salford/rovers, or Leigh/Cats and not Saints/Leeds?
Similarly, at magic we are allocated another bottom-four side, but I guess in that instance we were paired with Huddersfield so that Cas-Wakey could be the other one? Whether there is a definitive logic process to all this I don't know, this is rugby league after all!'"
Regardless, I now know more than I did, so thanks.
Didn't know they split the league into groups.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1885 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: scarrie "How are the loop fixtures arrived at, I'm assuming there is some sort of logic to it?'"
I believe because we finished 11th, we play 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th and 9th 3 times. So if we'd have finished 5th and Leigh 11th for example, we'd still have the same loop fixtures
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1116 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Faithful One "I believe because we finished 11th, we play 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th and 9th 3 times. So if we'd have finished 5th and Leigh 11th for example, we'd still have the same loop fixtures'"
That does make some sense and is reasonably logic. So I guess, under that criteria, if we had finished tenth last year (or even bottom ) we would have been given a third derby (as rovers were second) instead of playing Wigan for a third time?
The Huddersfield game (9th v 11th) is the one to be played out at magic weekend alongside the likes of Wigan v Wire (1st v 3rd). That does look fairly clear, for once!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1062 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2007 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Doesnt this system just entrench the top teams at the top and the bottom teams at the bottom? I don't understand it from a fairness point of view
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 8191 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote: OmneFC "Doesnt this system just entrench the top teams at the top and the bottom teams at the bottom? I don't understand it from a fairness point of view'"
I'm not a fan of the loop fixtures as they just serve a purpose of getting more fixtures due to it being a 12 team league. Increasing the league to 14 would negate the need for the loop fixtures to an extent but would mean the central pot then has to be shared by another 2 clubs. A 14 team league for me would be a much fairer system and a level playing field for all as every team plays each other once home and away.
The problem I have with the loop fixtures is it removes the level playing field by having a system in which you play each team home and away but then the league is split in to odds and evens where all the teams that finished the league on an odd number play each other once, and the same with the evens. The Loop fixtures would have been better if each team then played every other team once more, the only problem is that would extend the season by a further 5 weeks/games.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1116 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Chris71 "I'm not a fan of the loop fixtures as they just serve a purpose of getting more fixtures due to it being a 12 team league. Increasing the league to 14 would negate the need for the loop fixtures to an extent but would mean the central pot then has to be shared by another 2 clubs. A 14 team league for me would be a much fairer system and a level playing field for all as every team plays each other once home and away.
The problem I have with the loop fixtures is it removes the level playing field by having a system in which you play each team home and away but then the league is split in to odds and evens where all the teams that finished the league on an odd number play each other once, and the same with the evens. The Loop fixtures would have been better if each team then played every other team once more, the only problem is that would extend the season by a further 5 weeks/games.'"
Think the key point from the clubs perspective (or more specifically the club owners perspective) is the central pot, particularly the Sky money. Having the loop fixtures allows the clubs to have the two extra home games without having to forfeit any of the central pot. They get to have their cake and eat it in this instance.
The downside to that, especially from a fan's viewpoint, is it creates the uneven playing structure as you point out above, which is unedifying for most supporters. Unless the Tv money is increased somehow I can see us being stuck with the loop games for the foreseeable future. Like you say Chris, this is to the detriment of the league as a sporting competition.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1464 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Pure coincidence I know, but we always seem to end up playing Cats, Warrington and Wigan 3 times a season.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 12749 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I will be pleasantly surprised if we don't finish in the bottom 2.
We just need to get a win on the board early doors by whatever means, (spawn, fluke, brilliance ) and some confidence behind us.
Wouldn't wanna be going away to Wakefield in Round 5 without a W behind us.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 25783 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: WIZEB "I will be pleasantly surprised if we don't finish in the bottom 2.'"
I'll be disappointed if we do, I think we have a good enough squad to finish above Cas and Wakey.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 12749 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Dave K. "I'll be disappointed if we do, I think we have a good enough squad to finish above Cas and Wakey.'"
I'll be disappointed also but I don't like the look of the fixture list having to play them two and Huddersfield away before return fixtures, and the loop games are tough.
We live in hope.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 25783 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'm sticking with my optimism, it might be gone by the end of February though
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 9521 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: WIZEB "I will be pleasantly surprised if we don't finish in the bottom 2.
We just need to get a win on the board early doors by whatever means, (spawn, fluke, brilliance
Pretty sure Hull will finish between 9th and 12th - outside of Cas, Wakefield and Huddersfield I don't see another club that are a realistic target to get above. I wouldn't be surprised if any of those four clubs finish bottom.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 25783 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: MadDogg "Pretty sure Hull will finish between 9th and 12th - outside of Cas, Wakefield and Huddersfield I don't see another club that are a realistic target to get above. I wouldn't be surprised if any of those four clubs finish bottom.'"
Salford could be in danger, depends what happens with them and they have a thin squad.
Leighs an interesting team, lost alot of quality, a few gamble signings, but still have Ipapa and Lam.
As ever alot of teams succes will be based in injuries
|
|
|
|
|
|