Looking at the pic that was in one of the Aussie Papers of Slaters ear how they can determine thats a bit mark is anyones guess it looks like a scratch nothing more.

If his ear had have been bitten then surely his ear would be marked around the edge of the ear on the helix more than just the tiny scratch inside on the anntihelix unless James Graham has a perculiar jaw action with one tooth thats much longer than his others.

This reminds me of an incident in the latter part of the 2010 season here in Oz in NSW Cup. www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 5913053707 Just wondering if Slater felt the same thing?

This reminds me of an incident in the latter part of the 2010 season here in Oz in NSW Cup. www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 5913053707 Just wondering if Slater felt the same thing?

More detailed report of the proceedings now up [url=http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/nrl/graham-judiciary/story-e6frfgbo-1226488427893 here[/url

12 weeks was not nearly long enough. Should have been a life ban. A disgusting act.

[url=http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/im-a-lover-not-a-biter-defiant-graham-maintains-innocence-20121004-271tw.htmlJammer is maintaining his innocence[/url

Clearly I have.

So despite the evidence presented against him biting (whilst the only evidence for him biting, was the inconclusive video clip) they've found him guilty.

And given him a longer ban than a player who definately had a chomp.

What a joke.

Looks like they have retained the same systems we used in the 18th century on them.

Yep. They had their minds made up before Graham even turned up.

Unbelievable stuff. So there is no evidence that there was a bite, medical evidence against it being a bite mark and supporting my theory that it was a nail injury. Yet they still find him guilty in less than 10 minutes and decide to go beyond the regulations and ban him for longer than the maximum ban.

I hope Slater gets what is owed to him next season. I should imagine there will be 17 Canterbury players out to hurt him properly next season. He's scum, this for me is a false allegation designed to get a player sent off in a Grand Final.

Clearly yet another trolling post from this contributor.

Why would there be '17 Canterbury players out to hurt him properly next season'?

The video evidence was as clear as day. Even the most blinkered Canterbury Bankstown Bulldogs supporter knows that Graham is guilty of a despicable act upon a fellow professional.

Quite a clever move by the Bulldogs staff to get Graham to go not out on this one though. In the highly unlikely event he was found innocent (which upon looking at the evidence was virtually nil) its a victory for the Bulldogs. Now they can claim an 'innocent' man has been convicted of this act they can use it to reinforce the 'no one likes us' mentality that the side and their predominantly Lebanese supporter base try and promote.

As an interchange player Graham was ultimately worth sacrificing.

You make it sound like he raped someone.

Nobody other than Jammer and Slater knows whether he is guilty of anything. However, people the world over like to join in with lynch mobs.

Personally, I believe he's innocent of the charge. I think he had been convicted even before he got there. Stinks rotten.