Yep, you do!

Absolutely spot on.

Green light given for financial irresponsibility now. Precedent set.

Widnes must feel gutted that they had to wait 3 long years - the game is very fortunate that a man like Steve O'Connor didn't walk away from the whole shambles.

So the message is clear to SL clubs.Going into administration is no longer significant or 'very significant', (as Lewis said about Widnes) and will not harm your future application.Shathouses.

So O'Conner is fine whilst Glover is not. The rules were changed ironically to save Crusaders and certainly not Wakefield - live with it as tht's what we were being told to do before sanity took charge.

Just having shiney seats doesn't make you a better option than Wakefield.
I have sympathy for Halifax but I don't see why the OP thinks they should be in over us.

Halifax have done everything asked to get to the point of applying, not to necessarily get a license.

The process is meant to be transparent. We'll see.

I'm pleased for Wakefield's fans and feel really sorry for Halifax, but as a neutral observer this looks like a desperately unfair decision to me.

I'd have a little more sympathy for Halifax if they hadn't fudged their way past the 2500 average attendance criterion by having a couple of thousand extra people mysteriously turn up for their last home game of the year. And it seems like only a couple of years since I was asked to chuck coins in a bucket to save halifax.

A couple of years get a grip at least 5, 3 years ago wakefield promised a new stadia, 3 years later still no brick laid so they have lied on 2 applications and also gone bust.

This game is incredibly corrupt and if the crusaders had only pulled out yesterday then the announcement should have been postponed to be re-evaluated.

Some of the reaction on here is laughable, from the RFL is corrupt to Rupert Murdoch decided who gets licence and who doesn't



Deary me. I'm as surprised as anyone that Wakefield survived and got a licence but then I'm even more surprised that Crusaders decided last minute to withdraw their application, so late was it not even the team knew it was going to happen.

How many people who are blasting the RFL for their 'decision' have seen and deliberated over all the licence applications?!?

People also assuming that Wakefield had to be the team that dropped out, why? Let's be realistic there was 13 applications put before the committee and the best applications have know been selected but to assume it was Wakefield that had to go is stupid, anyone was in danger of going if they didn't meet the criteria. Regardless of what people think of Wakefield's application for all we know 'Fax's application might now been as watertight as we think it is. The RFL don't just sit there and pick whoever the feel like and the selection has to be focussing on the long term, these licence's are for 3 years - maybe the Wakey bid looks a stronger, long term applications that Fax application.

That point's a bit irrelevant though.

They must have decided that Fax's proposal was worse than Wakey's. Presumably, Crusaders would have retained their place (I'm guessing) and Wakefield would have been kicked out, had the Crusaders not withdrawn.

Crusaders asked to withdraw because their finances wouldnt last three years? the application was too weak to suceed anyway? i would hope crusaders jumped before they were pushed!

But didn't they in their previous guise advise on rail privatisation!?