The cricket?

Another furphy.

Soccer's concentration in the box actually damages pitches more.

Ah the irony!

mmm, just what I was thinking.

Well my parties seats were taken up by some idiots who claimed their seats had been taken, they refused to budge and the stewards were useless. On the plus side we got better seats in the end but we missed like 15 minutes of the first half.

I think most people know that given that it's usually balder than Tele Savalas in the penalty areas and centre circle. Mark Lawrenson, Alan Amith and the like just like to prove they really are ignorant every once in a while.

No it wasn't.

It was 38,572.

I usually go to at least a couple fo matches, but this year I simply can not be bothered. I have been watching them on Sky, its cheaper, warmer and I can vent my speeen without worrying about people sat around me.

I think the game was well attended and the empty seats looked like the dearer ones.

Blessing in disguise?

Does anyone else not think that the 2.30 KO affected the turn out?

I had a game myself and so had to watch the game on sky plus later.

Had it not clashed, i'd have been there with another 10-15 people instead we all watched it at mine after the game.

BBC's decision?

have'nt fans "wanted" a afternoon kick off for years?