Isn't the problem that the RFL is putting on two few of the events that people actually want to attend, and too many events that people don't?

Personally, I'd rather watch far more England v NZ tests at Wembley, like we saw a fortnight ago, than I would additional rounds of Salford v Castleford or Hull KR v Wakefield. I suspect that many others (apart from perhaps the fans of the four clubs mentioned) feel a similar way. Unfortunately, we have too few clubs arguing that instead of putting our best product on show in front of 60k, in a big city and to a TV audience of 3m more often, we have to play more lower-quality games that few people are interested in because some clubs "couldn't possibly survive" without them. It is a mentality that seriously holds the game back in this country.

People will pay to see the world's best on their doorstep - we saw that on Saturday and we see it whenever the NFL and NBA rolls into town every year. Origin would just be another one of these events; the best players in the world playing within a reasonable distance from my front door. Why wouldn't I want to see that?

SOO at Wembley wouldn't be taking money out of English RL because, quite frankly, I doubt much of that money would even make it to English RL in the first place. If English RL could put on more events that I, and 70k+ others were willing to pay to see, then it might be a different story.

I agree with your first part but im not sure the 2nd part is right or relevant.

Yes the RFL need to improve the events they put on and their marketing of them. SoO at Wembley doesn’t do this.

There probably isnt a huge direct line you can draw to say that because of SoO person A didn’t go to RFL event B, but it is a cannibalisation of a market we agree is too small.

There are only a certain amount of people who will go watch an RL event, there are only a certain amount of people who will pay top whack to watch an RL event in London, and that certain amount of people will only spend a certain amount of money doing so. Having SoO over here damages our brand and gives our market another option other than us.

The NRL is a competition we should compete with, it’s a game we should look upon as equals. Having SoO over here is a tacit acknowledgement that we aren’t, and it entrenches our 2nd position rather than narrows the gap to first. In fact it does worse than that in that it builds up our rivals while doing down ourselves.

Correct, so what has this got to do with my attitude? The fact that the NRL are exploiting a market that they can benefit from means my opinion should be changed?



No it won't. It raises the profile of the NRL superiority and puts a negative effect on our brand. If you think Kids will take notice of a game they won't even understand anything about, then you're sadly wrong. This is the reason why SL is on its backside, naivety.



Now you're going a bit off topic. I was discussing the attraction of SOO to me and the arrogance of that article. But I will follow you. The RFL are poor at maximizing the potential of SL, we have known that for a long long time. However they did a damn fine job hosting the WC and are already making positives vibes regarding SL sponsorhip on the back of that, so lets hold our breath.

Leeds, my club, my city do a fantastic job. the RLWC was splashed all over Leeds. Pulling in 18K+ for a nothing game was a huge scoop for us. Nothing more could have been done.

The Leeds Rugby accounts show they are playing their part, have their own sponsorship in order and running a fine business. Its not up to them the drive the game forward. After all everyone is sick and tired of Gary Heatheringtons input arn't they? GH has built the model RL club.

I'd go.

I would go if they did, but I'd prefer it if they took it to China, Japan, Hong Kong, Indonesia etc. They've got the biggest market in the world right on their doorstep and they've never once tried to take the game there.

Get 60,000 in Wembley (including probabley nearly every Aussie living in London) for an amazing game of RL and market the hell out of London Broncos to everyone there. In fact, you could have Broncos play their weekly SL round as the warm up fixture (and if played on a Sat afternoon it wouldn't clash with other SL matches).

Yep, of course, this would be AWFUL for Super League...

Now that I think about it, i'm surprised we haven't taken Origin to England before. However, we probably should remember that while Origin has almost always been big, it's only in the last 5 or so years that it has become extraordinarily massive in Australia.

I'd seriously considering coming from Sydney to see Origin in London.

If they sort themselves out quickly enough, i'm definitely in to watch my Raiders play Manly in China next year. These would be opportunities of a lifetime.

The problem is the Aussies in London don't care for us and never have done. They either see SL as inferior to the NRL or they're union fans who turn out for the big events.

I think it is a good idea for a State of Origin game to be played at Wembley to help RL win its battle in London

And in return, I think it is only fair that we schedule a Wigan Saints game in Perth and a Hull derby in Adelaide to help Rugby League develop in those cities

I don't think you can confidentially make that claim until someone has actually tried to market to that group. London Broncos certainly haven't bothered as far as I can see (and I live in London).

No final decision yet but they've been looking at Manly v Canberra in China for next season.

If it was in London I wouldn't go.. to far and too much expense for a game that has nothing to do with a team I support...