You are entitled to your opinion Beverly Red.
The one thing I will mention is the highlighted text.
The "superstars" from down south did play last year, Australia played the World Champions twice as I recall.
Is it Englands god given right that Australia come to England to play? or host England by themselves in a series that may well lose money?

In or around the last decade Australia has hosted two Test series compared to England's four home series, hardly an even effort is it?

As for the WCC it is a pre season warm up that the Australians are contractually obliged to play, they are hardly going to say to the media they are not really interested in a one sided biased event that they don't really rate are they?

Most of those players have been in the team for some time and they have not come close against Australia though.
You need a stand off that can run himself OR link up, not one or the other, that is what make defences question their options, if you can not offer a threat to the line yourself say as Thurston does then you are limited and you limit your team outside of you.
I would like Tomkins at Stand off to be honest, he would have the defences in two minds and bring them out of the line.

But Tomkins couldnt organise the team to anywhere near an acceptable level and remove any kind of decent kicking game from the team unless you were to put in someone like Brough, who has more downsides to his game and isnt as good at organising or kicking as Sinfield is.

There are positives and negatives to whoever you pick, and we are picking a team not a list of individuals. It doesnt matter if Sinfield doesnt have the speed if someone else does, like it doesnt matter if Tomkins doesnt have the kicking Skills or organisation skills if someone else does.

Put Sinfield at Lock or Hooker then, he probably played his best Tests at Hooker, Roby could come off the bench.
Half back and Standoff are the lynchpins in a game, all great teams have had champion halves that wielded the team around.
Ok Hookers and Fullbacks are important too in a different way, you rarely see a top team that does not have great halves. Its been an area lacking in England's game for a long time, England's halves have never been man for man as good as Australia's for what feels like an eternity.
Those positions decide the big games and it is no coincidence that the Halves are the players that win most awards and MOM etc,
Kevin does a great job at Leeds but the intensity week in week out and quality of more than half of the opposition in SL makes him appear more capable than he is compared to the best Halves in the World.

That's just my two bob.

Put him where ever you want, a position is only a name, Sinfield is still going o do what he does, call Tomkins a prop, he is still only going to do what Tomkins does.

Seem to think a certain Jason Smith did rather well in the NRL with Canberra after finishing with Hull at the age of 33 (finished at the Cowboys at almost 36.) He wasn't fast or mobile & a bit overweight as well as still a bit crocked from injuries so could only do 40 mins a game max. Whilst at their best I'd have JS anytime over Sinfield, Sinfield is not too disimilar and would command a role in many NRL sides.
That he may not get into all sides is moot, his influence on games not just in his rugby play are there to see.

Who'se fault was it when the super stars of the south did play us?

Sinfield's International Record V Australia
Oct 28 2000 LOST - England 2 Australia 22
Nov 11 2001 WON - GB 20 Australia 12
Nov 17 2001 LOST - GB 12 Australia 40
Nov 24 2001 LOST - GB 8 Australia 28
Jul 12 2002 LOST - Australia 64 GB 10
Nov 15 2003 LOST - GB 20 Australia 23
Nov 22 2003 LOST - GB 12 Australia 18
Nov 6 2005 LOST - GB 6 Australia 20
Nov 19 2005 LOST - GB 14 Australia 26
Nov 2 2008 LOST - Australia 52 England 4
Oct 31 2009 LOST - England 16 Australia 26
Nov 14 2009 LOST - England 16 Australia 46
Nov 5 2011 LOST - England 20 Australia 36
Nov 12 2011 LOST - England 8 Australia 30

I think anybody who wanted to say a loss was somebody’s ‘fault’ would be showing a pretty poor understanding of international sport.

Did he play on his own against them, no wonder he lost that many.

How many has NRL legends Adrian Morley, Sam Burgess and Gareth Ellis won against the Aussies?

I think anybody who wanted to imply that Sinfield was deprived of international success in 2012 because the superstars of the south wouldn't play would be showing not only a pretty poor understanding of international sport, but also of Sinfield's less than enviable international historical record and lack of credibility as a player at that level.

Did Sinfield play on his own for the Leeds Rhinos? No wonder they've won that many SL titles from 5th

His international credibility is a subjective opinion, yours is he lacks it. Most people would probably think that your opinion lacks credibility, especially the corner you have painted yourself into regarding England and Leeds Rhino’s especially has led to some fairly incredulous opinions that you have put forth. But both my opinion on your credibility and yours on Kevin Sinfields are irrelevant because it is impossible to say what would have happened because they didn’t play, it is unarguable fact, that Australia’s decision not to play, and the disappointingly potical proposal from NZ did deprive Kevin Sinfield of the opportunity for international success against the major southern hemisphere sides and as such it is clearly correct to say that it wasn’t his fault he didn’t have success against those nations this year.

Sinfield did experience international success this year by the way. The international game doesn’t start and stop with the Australians, however much they, and their fanboys believe it does.

Perhaps he was denied. He's won MOM the last two times England have played New Zealand over here. If we could've had a 3 game England vs NZ series their's a good chance he might have been Man of the Series.

Who awarded him Man of the Match in the game played in England?