the RFL decision on Ryan Bailey: Player attempts to regain feet and play the ball, forearm makes unintentional contact with opponent, provokes opponent but no misconduct

i for one am pleased Radders is available for selection. he got punished as did FC through the sending off.it probably cost them a 4th place finish, was the sending off justified? yes! but only if other players receive the same punishment for the same offence,unfortunately it boils down to inconsistent refereeing yet again, Bailey was looking for a reaction from Radford and got it, should Radford have retaliated ..no, but in the heat of the moment he did and paid a hefty price.now is Radford a coward? no i think not. in the end i suppose SOS was the right outcome even though i think Bailey should have seen yellow too for his part. oh and yes i am a Red n White. just trying to be constructive id like to see what neutral fans make of the situation.

Probably the most impartial comment I've ever heard from a Robin. Good show.

That is a pick of Ryan Bailey in the action of throwing the first elbow.

realy!!

Yes.
In fact, there were never even three or four people tackling him at once so your point isn't a point.

Bailey bounced of Fitzgibbon, Radford wrapped low and Houghton went highhttps://img210.imageshack.us/img210/8503/radfordtackle2.png" >

So, is it just to through 4 elbows at one man to get him off?

i just watched the replay,4 defenders on bailey he goes down,attempts to get a quick play the ball but is attacked while on the floor!!

Haven't you got some homework?

SATS Level 2 isn't that easy you know

i so no elbows!! you must be tripping!

like i said just trying to be constructive and try to give an unbiased account. dont get me wrong nothing would give me greater pleasure than seeing us turn you over. no doubt you feel the same way just hope its a great game this sat the world will be watching us

bull crap

sorry old man