At the end of the day, what's the problem?

The RFL have committed THEIR money, they've not stolen it from any other club or individual supporters. The other clubs directors don't appear to have a problem with the arrangement. The only people who do seem to have a problem are the usual chippy posters on here, who would dearly love to see the clock turned back and watch Frank Machin running out at Belle Vue in all its black & white glory.

Some of you need to get over yourselves.

/rolfharris

Can you tell what it is yet?

/rolfharris

Is it an idiotic troll?

Mmmmmmmm

So they sold something to the RFL in case they needed the money to pay for something that might not need paying and put the money into the club cos it has no money. Very smart.

A novel way for the RFL to avoid the embarrassment of giving a licence to a club that has been or is about to go into administration...........

Congratulations!!!! You're the 1 millionth person to purposefully ignore the actual facts and make up some conspiracy theory

Chomp!

T!t

When precisely has the club been in administration?

If you want a precedent for the RFL giving a licence to a club that has just been in administration, look no further than Wakefield.

Prize Pìllock.

Mmmmmmmm..... The Bulls (so you have stated earlier) paid Bradford Council a 'peppercorn' rent so therefore the lease is only worth a few peppercorns. So why pay a 7 figure sum for it?

Back to school tomorrow adey lad eh? First lesson reading and comprehension. Where PRECISELY do I say the bulls have been in administration? Nah, I didn't. Pillock

Keep chewing the bone eh? Your going round in circles to the point of wetting yourself is keeping me most amused!

Learn to read, won't look a tit then!

I meant the embarrassment the RFLP should have suffered over wakey and crusaders, but if you have to explain it ..,....

So you can then rent in back and charge a six figure commercial rent every year. A long lease on a peppercorn rent is tantamount to a freehold for most practical purposes. You DID understand that the RFL are renting the ground back to the Bulls? On what is essentially a sale and leaseback arrangement? After all, it has only been said about a hundred times.

Now was there anything else about commercial property deals that I can educate you about?

Methinks it is YOU who need to learn how to read. And it is YOU to whom it needs to be explained.

And you who look to the whole world to be a tìt.

After all, only a total and utter tìt would state something stupid, then try and ridicule his opposite for pointing out his stupidity, then realise in fact his opposite was correct and he HAD stated something stupid, and try and get out of it by saying what he says he REALLY meant as if it was the other one's fault not to have understood that what he SAID was not at all what he meant. And make himself look an even bigger tìt in so doing.

But I guess we have to make allowances for him being bitter, twisted - and stupid. Just like old times with our friends from down the road, in fact. His real issue of course is that the RFL told his club their SL application did not cut it.