Fair point. Not what this thread is about though and it has been dealt with. All clubs have disciplinery issues. Some take longer to deal with them than others.

I do agree that we shouldn't have touched him in the first place if we're trying to get a more squeaky clean feel about the club. He was always high risk. He's been dealt with appropriately and will be on probably his last ever chance at the top level.

Still not as stupid as signing Stuart Reardon on the day we launched a domestic violence campaign (and then it being found out he failed the medical!) so a load of bad press for absolutely nothing!

I’d forgotten about that gem. We are so lucky to be shut of that band of idiots.

He's also only himself to blame if he wasn't aware.

Ignorance is no defence.

It's about taking responsibility for one's actions.

Having read the Ben Cooper report I now agree that fault lies with him rather than Gleeson/Long. Apologies.

How convenient.

Perhaps you could start a Gleeson & Long are innocent campaign?

Long hasn't been charged with anything and thus is innocent already.

Gleeson never denied that he'd inadvertently taken a banned substance and hasn't tried to challenge the guilty verdict. As you said in your other post the ultimate responsibility for checking any supplement lies with the athlete, although in this case he was given duff information - albeit second-hand - by someone he had every right to trust.

He was found innocent of any wrongdoing because the conditioner at the time was proven to be a fraud. The RFL had employed him prior to Saints and I believe had recommended him to Saints. That's aside from the relative lack of education, information and clarification of responsibility that there was then compared to now in RL when it comes to banned substances. I believe that it is ultimately the player's responsibility to check against the list of banned substances readily available on the UKDA website before taking anything, whether recommended by their conditioner or not.

Nah, they both have history together for being numb as pumps.

Quote: SaintsFan "He was found innocent of any wrongdoing because the conditioner at the time was proven to be a fraud.'" Probably innocent too when he was also helping Longy's father promote his dodgy health and sports nutrition stall at Wigan market. www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2004/jan/31/rugbyleague

Quote: SaintsFan "He was found innocent of any wrongdoing because the conditioner at the time was proven to be a fraud.'" Probably innocent too when he was also helping Longy's father promote his dodgy health and sports nutrition stall at Wigan market. www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2004/jan/31/rugbyleague

Well said ,could not agree more.

Will there be/should there be any punishment of Hull FC for this?

We got there in the end

seeing as everyone involved in the fiasco has now either left or sacked what would be the point and would it be legal ?

I just posed the same question on our board.

My own view is that if this story gains sufficient attention in the mainstream media, the RFL may decide to issue a points deduction and/or a fine, to address any suggestion that they are toothless or don't take these matters seriously enough. People will say of course that neither Wigan or WTW copped such sanctions when Messrs Hock and Newton were busted for drug cheating - they key difference is that in neither of those cases was there any suggestion that club officials were involved in an attempted cover-up.

Either way, It's a sordid mess and does the game no favours at all.