Not sure why people are picking Eastmond or Myler over Tomkins. Myler hasn't played consistently & consistently well for months, and Eastmond hasn't played huge amound either. Tomkins is the reason that Wigan actually ended up with an ok season, not looked out of his depth at one point.

CANNOT believe that LMS aint been selceted!!!!! Northern Bias once again eh?

Whilst i think tompkins is far from the finished article, i would say that he has had the better season. I would say that eastmond has more potential though.

Nothing to do with the fact he isn't half as good as the players picked

Agreed, very good player but there are better players in the forwards than him.

Watmough is more of an athlete than Hanley was. I'd say he's probably faster too.

And just while we are talking about Hanely, he wasnt as good as you lot rate him.

Shut up

Who cares what you think anymore.

Shut up clown.

Great comeback. Brilliant.

Hanley could run sideways quicker than Whatmough can run forward. You really are deluded if you think any of the Aussie are pack are quicker than Hanley was.

Whatmough stands out in the NRL because the standard of players in the NRL is falling. Although SL is miles behind, Aussies know the standard of players being produced is not as good as it was. But then you are an expert cos you watch ESPN

The standard of players in the NRL is not falling at all. A lot of positions over the last few years have evolved. Ball playing loose forwards don't exsist anymore in Aus, the stand off role is more of a third centre position now, and back rows are now far more mobile and athletic than they once were. Whatmough is not as good as Hanly was but as modern day 2nd rowers go he's top class.