Phil Clarke's approach is make outrageous predictions that never come off, but when one does it makes him look like a genius. He sits there like a disinterested dummy until he gets to spout his overexcited nonsense, then he goes quiet again, like someone has switched him off again.

Why did Phil Clarke, both pre- and post-game, try and make the point “Salford haven’t been champions since before the outbreak of World War 2”?

They were champions in 1974 and 1976.

How does that bloke get a gig on tele? He’s clueless!

Yep. A few years back he used to focus on the stats a bit more and i preferred that. But now like you say he just says daft things while rarely being able to hide his Wigan bias.

By the way there’s nothing wrong with having someone on with a bias toward one team. I’m sure Carney wants Wigan to succeed just as much as Clarke and I’m sure Jon Wells wants Cas to succeed but you rarely get any hint of that in their analysis or observations.

Salford winning demonstrates how low the standard of SL is this season.

Of course I don’t believe that guff but I offer it as a get out clause to all the over entitled arrogant berks who’s elitist world has just been smashed to bits.

Brilliant work Salford, every expert had you pinged as bottom feeders, yep even me.

At last a team has proved that teamwork even on the lowest budget can work.

Even more stunning when you consider that under the Doctor, the pin up boy of the elitist brigade he did nothing with Salford when he was throwing money at them.

It’s not even rocket science, a decent coach, a smattering of talent, a bit of luck, a team that grafts and the people at the top doing the rest.

This shows along with London’s efforts that every new season is a fresh slate and anyone can win it, there are no make weights anymore, great for the game.

Who cares about the ratings of individual players. It's how they play as a team that matters. What's the saying "being greater than the sum of its parts". The opposite is true for my team, Warrington.
Salford have been fantastic this season.

I keep hearing that Salford had the lowest playing budget, lower than london

Does anyone else think Phil Clarke might be Jean and his multiple usernames?

He talks the same level of

Quote: MattyB "Well there goes Salford's team talk sorted. Cheers Phil.'" like said it wasn't missed https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/ph ... an-watson/

Quote: MattyB "Well there goes Salford's team talk sorted. Cheers Phil.'" like said it wasn't missed https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/ph ... an-watson/

Will every neutral become a temporary Salford fan next weekend?

Yup

Aye, got mi tickets.

Nope.

Some Warrington fans on this site have admitted to wanting Saints to win because they don't want to see Salford win a GF before them.

That's the trouble with Yorkshire folk. They look at things reasonably.

have they?

Really, and why care? The team that's scored more points after 80 minutes, wins, end of. If so and so wants one team to win it doesn't count for anything, as it will have no bearing on the result.
And no, I don't believe any of that Uri Geller nonsense, either!