That's because you are a troll and that's why nobody bothers with your silly nonsense anymore.

Like all poor jokes trolling has a very short lifespan and yours is well past it's sell by date. My advice is give it up now it's over, there's a good boy.

As usual vastman cannot deal with the substance of my carefully crafted argument.

Just dismisses it all as trolling and gets back to celebrating the parochial club that still plays at that rat-hole called Bell Vue.

The fact is that the forces of globalism and modernity -- Toulouse and Toronto -- are coming, and antiquated parochials like woeful Wakefield, silly Salford and witless Widnes will all be swept away in the storm.

Your first line says it all - you're a troll looking for an argument - problem is nobody can be bothered anymore. You and all your previous incarnation are a spent force, it's actually quite sad watching you flounder like Kevin the teenager, ever more desperate to gain attention.

JUST PUT HIM ON IGNORE....AND FOR CHRIST SAKE STOP QUOTING HIS POSTS SO THOSE OF US WHO HAVE SEEN THE LIGHT AND MUTED THE "CRAP DOZEY" DON'T HAVE TO SEE HIS RAMBLINGS

Not many. It is expensive to fly from Toulouse to northern England every other week. It is exorbitantly expensive to fly from Toronto to Manchester several times a year, and then stay over for several weeks in a hotel. Who can afford to do that? Certainly not anyone with a job.

I'll tell you something Jean - there is a good change that Toronto might pick up a few fans based in England. They will be playing games on block and based in Bradford, some fans might want to check 'em out. I will certainly be going to a game or two to see what all the fuss is about.

I thought the Bradford thing fell through? Not saying you're wrong btw, I can see them picking up a modest following of UK based fans.

You're right, the shared base with the Bulls fell through, but they'll now be training at Brighouse Rangers.

Including 2005 when they brought 100 to the Galpharm?

And when people say ( insert club) travel in numbers? how are "numbers" defined? ALL clubs travel in numbers, some clubs have good support at most games relative speaking, others don't, for example, Huddersfield took over 1000 to Batley, which for us is good numbers, but yet we took just over 100 to Hull which isn't so good, so can i claim that we take good numbers based on Batley?
I saw a Bradford fan claiming they took "good numbers" everywhere, but again, it's all relative isn't it? For example, Bradford's last away game was at Workington, the crowd was 596, so how many Bradford fans travelled? 100-200? would that be classed as good numbers? yet for other clubs taking 100 -200 to Workington could be seen as poor?
See my point? All clubs are capable of taking big followings, as equally as they are capable of taking poor followings.

Three official coaches left Leigh that day so where does that figure come from? the back end of 2005 has been erased from the history books btw. What was the support in the previous meeting in 2002/3??

On topic Yorkshire will probably suffer where HKR took over 1000, Thurs/Fri M6 travel as we know does not motivate you to make the effort most games. Cas can expect 1500/2000 for the opener and our first home game will be 8k+