Can anyone really blame them? Concept is fine, it's the logistics. If we want to keep this going we're going to have to play more of the games in Aus.

Only Wigan would generate sufficient interest from fans in Australia for it to be financially viable there.

It seems more NRL clubs are not keen on the World Club series - The World club challenge is a genuine meaningful game even to the Aussies these days but rightly I agree the other games have very little meaning - I remember Sky sports billing it Australia V England - If thats the case just have an Australia v England game

This is not a negative post - Far from it I would love to see a major International club comp, I think it would be great if it was done as a major comp - But what we had this year was a major game, with two Trial matches as the Aussies put it and simply there not wrong

WCC - Cronnula V Wigan or Wigan V Cronulla will be good either way for me

Spot on. It took a while for the Aussies to take the main game seriously again, why we thought that 2 extra teams would always be up for games that had nothing to win on the line I don't know. Problem we/the game has with doing anything along the lines of an international club competition or even internationals is that the only proper opposition we can face is from the other side of the world and logistically I can understand why Aussie clubs don't want to come here as they're trying to prepare for their season.

Whats the purpose of the WCC? The Aussies are in pre season training, the UK teams usually 2-4 games in. Both with different sets of players.

I'm struggling with the intent particularly the 6 team format. Maybe both GF winners playing each other 2 weeks after there respective finals might be the way forward.(I recognise the NRL final is a week earlier than ours!)

Brisbane have said they will play if asked and have no problem traveling to the UK

I like the WCC as long as it's one game, don't see the point in 3 games, who cares about second vs second in a one off game to prove who the best second team are ?? Wouldn't mind a 4 team round robin but we don't have room in the calendar. No wonder a high percentage of the nrl can't be bothered I don't blame them, it's a long way to travel for a pointless game to keep warrington/Leeds/Wigan happy. Nothing was wrong with champions vs champions for a trophy.

Best suggestion i've seen in a long while has been doing the rounds.

Having an NRL & Super League Grand Final rematch at Wembley early in the season. So this year it'd be Wigan - Warrington following by Cronulla - Melbourne. Two competitive meaningful fixtures, and chance to market tickets to both the heartlands and the Aussies in London.

It's surely a better sell for the NRL teams than the current options?

I dont see the point in that? It would be better if it was Wigan v Cronulla and Wire v Melbourne in a double header at Wembley...but even then, it wouldnt be anywhere near a large crowd

What's wrong with the old format of the WCC? There is no need for any more gimmicks.

Considering Saracens can get big crowds for a RU league game at Wembley I not so sure about that.

Yes if the NRL don't bother with any marketing but if the NRL decide to really make a go of this then I don't see why we couldn't get a bumper cry at Wembley or the Olympic stadium.

People will pay for live sport if they feel its a big event.