If the context of the rule book is applied in every game for every team then I don't have a problem. The problem is it's not and the rule book only applies to certain teams. I look forward to games with 10 men a side...

Scott grix hit escare's head with the shoulder, surely if the rule book is followed it should had been a red

And as we all know there isn't 2 refs in the land who apply the same decision/rules 2 games running !

Definite Red, Salford are fast becoming the Featherstone or Halifax or Bradford of the Super League

OK the event is over. Do you all feel that this was the only red card over the 6 matches?

What we are getting t here is consistency.

One other thing = I felt Joseph Cobb had anohter good TV game.

The RFL is always on the look out for more day officials, Why not apply if you think you can do a better job.

Embarrassing seeing him say that, especially on a stage like magic weekend. He really does need to get a grip on his emotions. He isn't helping himself or his team.

Similar high shot by Huddersfield's Mullally on a Catalan player that resulted in nothing more than a telling off. No doubt we will get some forum defence lawyer thinking up a reason why the two incidents should be viewed differently.

I don't have a problem with the Griffin red but it feels at times like Salford are playing to a different rule book to everyone else this year.

As it says here (almost) . '"

rlhttps://www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?6486rl

only just watched it, never a red, first contact is with the (ball carrying) arm of the Widnes player whom at point of contact is well below shoulder level, look at the freeze frame & his right leg is bent.

The 'no charge' result backs up it shouldn't have been a red, the 'sending of sufficient' is indeed inaccurate..s

Poor Salford

how did the McGilvery "tackle" not get a mention in dispatches?!

Because it wasn't worth mentioning?