I of course do respect your right to an opinion.

Infact, i am quite intrigued to know why you believe JP is 'not even close' to being a contender for MOS so far this season in your opinion.Please do tell...

Sorry I added a bit after you quoted me, but therein lies the answer.

I'm not suggesting for one second thatPeacock isn't playing very well just that there are at least two if not more who are playing much better and having a greater impact on the opposition.

The fact that my opinion was ridiculed.

I'm not happy to give the MoS award to a bloke who's caught on live TV abusing the official and using foul homophobic language toward the ref. The loss of control and out of context attack on a player half his size was an unedifying sight and sealed it for me.

The fact that the award is now closely associated with Steve Prescott means, IMO, that Peacock ruled himself out of contention

You do have a right to an opinion. Just as i have the right to find it hilarious.

So can you actually show us where anybody said you shouldn't have opinion?

You don't want the MoS to go to a player who's ever abused an official? That's pretty much exempted any player who's played for longer than a couple of seasons.
I don't quite see why dissent should stop a player receiving the MoS rather than say committing a spear tackle that could endanger a players life.
As for your assertion Peacock used homophobic abuse I'd stop now before the lawyers get involved if I were you, especially considering you've clearly made it up.

By the way, if in the future you don't want your opinions ridiculed, then don't post ridiculous opinions.

The videos on YouTube fella!

Go get your lawyer,

Talk about ridiculous comments.

Like I said earlier here comes the Rhino mob to back up their man

If you think referring to a referee as 'bent' is meant as any reference to sexuality then your lack of comprehension about its meaning in that situation is embarrassing.

There is no video on YouTube of Peacock being homophobic/making homophobic comments. There is only you making things up, and looking ridiculous in the process.

I haven't even suggested anyone for Man of Steel yet, not even Peacock. I think he'd be in the running but no-one has really stood out well beyond the others yet.

But carry on making a fool of yourself, it's hilarious!

Except when Richard Agar said the same word about the same referee they viewed it as homophobic and heavily fined and suspended him.

Agars quote was not sandwiched between two very offensive expletives and wasn't broadcast live on national television!

So it's not my interpretation that's in question here, however what is embarrassing is someone passing judgement without knowing the facts.
HTH

Clark has been excellent, but on the back of others. Some at Cas without the credit lay the foundation for Clark to excel.

Ones like a Peacock, who is not has good as last year do it off their own back.

Yeah, you. Richard Agar hasnt ever been suspended for making homophobic comments, or even charged with it.

Richard Agar wasnt suspended, he was find 6k, 3k of which was suspended for saying that Child was "100% responsible" for a loss.

Its not your interpretation that's in question here, its your sanity.

Ha Ha, that's not the way Richard Agar tells it but hey, you know best!

So Richard Agar served a suspension that wasnt reported by the RFL? And paid a fine the RFL said he only had to pay half of? And the RFL charged with publicly with one offence whilst secretly charging him and punishing him for another.

And up until this point everybody kept this weird situation secret just in case 3 years later they could let Jamie Peacock off with the same offence?

Do you have any evidence whatsoever of your claim? or was the charge, suspension and fine a secret only Richard Agar knew about