None,

London are in intensive care, relegation would be pulling the plug and stopping all treatment.
Salford would be an ambitious club suffering a large set back off the field which would then have a procession next year, likely winning every game which would be utterly pointless and counterproductive.

Bradford and Wakefield probably wouldn't survive and would go bust again.

All in all whoever is relegated will be utterly devastated as a club and unlikely to survive it or come out the other side in anything like a good position.

I would say the 2 most poorly supported teams should go, 2 clubs that bring the least amount of money into the competition.... London and Salford.

Catalan but they're not on your poll

London, because they need to regroup and build again before rising back up the divisions

Don't forget that although 2 clubs will be relegated this season, it is likely that the remaining 2+ clubs treading water above them in the league could easily be relegated next season anyway.

Hull FC and Hull KR, two nasty clubs.

Nutcase.

I should have made more clear what my meaning was in formulating this thread.

It is which two clubs would you [iwant[/i to see relegated [iof the ones that plausibly could get relegated[/i

Catalans are not plausible candidates for relegation because they are too far up the ladder and have too many home games left -- a majority of which they will surely win.

The same reasoning applies to Leeds, St Helens, Wigan and most of the others.

I guess the most cogent criticism that could be made of my list is that Hull FC is not there. But I just cannot imagine them being in the mix of candidates for relegation at season's end, especially now that they have bought the monster Setamaita Sa.

The amount of vindctive rubbish on here is unbelievable. 'I want that club to go down because I don't like them, even though the league as a whole would be worse without them'. The mentality that is ensuring RL will never be what it could be in the UK.

London & Wakefield. Both are not commercially viable entities, both are poorly supported.

As for those arguing for Bradford & Salford - the one that until recently had five-figure home crowds, the other will a multimillionaire owner wanting to create success for RL in the largest city in the North of England - wake the feck up.

After tonight's humiliating performance by Salford, losing to a youthful Wigan side missing ten first choice players, it seems to me that Salford might be better off putting Dr Koukash's millions into youth development while they regroup in the Championship.

I was hoping to be able to vote for Wigan and Hull FC. Bit of a let down.

Salford & London. Both offer nothing in terms of quality rugby, and I have more people in my office than they have turning up to watch their games!!