You guys make me laugh. Half the teams in the Championship play against 14 players every game,if you include the Ref.

Because he was playing Salford who the RFL Obviously have it in for

Doesn't matter how you look at it? At the end of the day Bradford coaching staff let one of their players take to the pitch before one of there other players injured or not came off, what if the injured player suddenly regained his whits and made a tackle? The fine against Salford was for letting an extra player take to the field before the player leaving the field came off. Bradford did the same and should also be fined simple. Lets hope Omar Khan has sold enough currys to cover the £10k fine at.

You're coming across as bitter 'Red League'.

Your team is relevant for once. Try to show a little humility.

Correct. However the severity of salfords fine is because the extra Salford player took part in three tackles. The Bradford player was walking off in back play and had no influence on match. You even scored while he was walking off so there was no disadvantage to Salford. Bradford will get a slap on wrist or a small fine at worst. It's the same offence but the size of the fine is determined by the circumstances. It isn't a fixed 10k fine.

No they wouldn't. It would depend on the circumstances. If I was carrying a ladder and I turned round and hit you in the face by accident and knocked your teeth out, it would be just that, an accident.

Salford broke the rules to their advantage, something your new owner seems to condone going by the things he's said in the press.
Bradford, should they actually be charged with anything which at present they have not, broke the rules on a technicality.

Bradford won't get fined, there's nothing you can do about it, get over it.

This is a nothing argument from a bitter salford fan, and tanseys tackle wasnt as bad as it looked full speed, his lack of a ban proves this

Weren't Wakefield prevented from bringing a man on is similar circumstances a few weeks back? Interesting to see what happens next. Although gotta admit, this a bit of a none issue.

As for the Tansey tackle was a hit to the head plain and simple, he should have walked.

@ RED LEAGUE, keep 'em coming kid, this is hilarious

I believe the rules state that a team shall have a maximum of 13 PLAYERS in the pitch NOT that there should only be 13 members of the playing staff on the pitch. Common sense (and IMHO an interpretation of the rules) would dictate that Salford had 14 players (actively involved in the game) on the pitch whereas Bradford only had 13. result = Salford broke the rules, bradford didnt. As for getting money back for only having 12.....rules stat MAXIMUM is 13.

Yet he didn't get a ban. Strange.
This is a player that plays for Cas a team not well known for being the darling of the RFL. Even stranger.
Or it's not what you say it is.
Your choice.

Come on, that's clutching at straws, they had 14 on the pitch whatever you want to call them. Should be a smaller fine, as operational rule breach, but with lesser potential significance. There's the consistency and we all move on.



It was a hit to the head, perhaps not intentional, but he was charged, and only got off with a ban due to an early guilty plea.

But then every team in SL will be fined whenever they make a substitution for a serious injury. The 4th official always let the subs come on before the injured player leaves the field.