Nice haul.

Irony surely.

1) What Luck?

2) Injuries? You was missing Briers Morley and Harrison? So we cant class that as a win because you wasnt at full strength? Therfore your 24-6 victory at the DW earlier this season cannot be counted as we were missing Pat Richards and Paul Deacon. It was also Finchys first game after his serious neck injury and Joel was suspended. So sorry but we will have to take that win off you then

3) Name a shocking decision from the referee?

4) Boring? We scored 44 points against you.. we even let you make it exciting for a bit by letting you score 24. Dont forget 2 length of the field efforts either

5) Well after that happened at kick off, you tacked Joel. Its not our fault your line couldnt be d setting itself up correctly, or your markers were too lazy to get square leaving the tiny gap for Sam to creep through and then round Hodgson like he was a 30 odd year old.. oh wait..


And to confirm..

It was great to beat the Dire in their own back yard, but no win over the Wolves is as good as beating St Helens. Plus Saints take winning and losing in the right way.

Widnes are your rivals, now jog along mate

Don't know what's worse, the poor troll attempt or the half brains who keep on biting even after it is laid out for them. Embarrassing.

And yet despite posting this, some people after your post still comment on what he put.

I mean, look at this Mr Side mong - legit cringing here.

Who is it then?

Still smarting a bit I see.

Barry Mackenzie who used to post here last year.

And that children, is what we call 'attention seeking' or 'trolling'.

Phipps is playing a little game with himself here where he posts this, knowing that he is Barry Mackenzie, and knowing we all know he is Barry Mackenzie. If however someone points this out to him, he classes it as a 'win', if we all ignore him he will become more and more controversial until somebody responds and then he feels validated. Its almost sweet in a pathetic way.

However, when he was Barry Mackenzie, it got to the point where people ignored him so often, he needed to be more and more controversial to get a response. If we all ignore him again the same thing will happen and he will disappear for a little while again.

No , he is occaisionly funny and mildly entertaining , this is an Internet forum , nobody ' wins ' anything on here , although you will attempt to change the laws of physics to try , that's when you aren't being condescending to everybody else , so people won't ignore him , any more than they should ignore you , at least he is funny sometimes

the reason warrington lost was because they weren't allowed to be 20-0 up after 15 minutes as usual

Ill have to disagree, I have never found him either funny or mildly entertaining, the same cant be said of you however, the little hissy fits you have thrown have on occasion been hilarious.

Which tells us that everybody is different , and some of us take themselves far too seriously