He fully deserved the try in my opinion and it would have been a travesty if it was not given for whats was impossible to see which direction the ball was travelling and who it was hitting.

Reward brilliance, not pedantic rule followers.

Forget the decision, where did Carvell get that pace from!!!

Get a drugs test on him, he was lightning!

Yes, a shocking decision. The fact that the ref referred suggested he felt there was a problem. Having viewed it he was correct. How anyone could give a try (as good a run as it was from Carvell) mystifies me.

Apart from the fact that Carvell was facing the Saints line throughout? Silverwood had seen it but wanted to double check. I'm convinced Ganson just stumbled onto the wrong button in a drunken lunge at the girl delivering him a beef sandwich.

Nice, now I have to mop up a mouthfull of Hoegaarden from my laptop keyboard.

PMSL - allegedly

Or a taxi!

More cringeworthy than him thinking Kings white hand belonged to the black player Eastmond?

So we are to just ignore the rules now then?

Only on 'moral' grounds, mind.

Can we reverse the result of previous Grand Finals to correct moral imperfections in the outcomes?

Personally i think the knock on rule should only apply if the ball touches the floor.
If it's pinballing between 2 players like it did leave it alone.
Where was Wellens the Wizz though ?

You got away with enough forward passes and hold-downs tonight so dont start.

and 100% of the players and coaches!

Only fans know the rules 100% but will not get out on the field and prove it.

As many different post on these forums "prove" one incident is interpreted so many ways, I mean the one about touch is ridiculous and yet keeps growing so what chance a set of match officials?

If the video ref hadn't beeen there or even on the box would a try have been scored? Would someone have broken wind 0.0030 seconds after the touchdown and would it have mattered anyway?

It's all supposition.

What happened , happened and that's that.

NEXT!!!