Sorry your post is absolute nonsence.

To use a recently used quote, your post is "written by someone with a basic knowledge of accounting and a little else"

Either repayment MUST be made within a 12 month period or there has to be some formal agreement for deferrment, which on the basis they are still current, would not appear to be the case.

The Article concerned is about as factual as you can get. It clearly states the date the accounts relate to and accuratly quotes figure from the accounts submit to companies house.

In short, you post was a pointless waste of effort.

OK, question time.

At what point did hullkr issue shares to the tune of £2m in the last 18 months?
or
At what point did hullkr take out long term loans the tune of £2m in the last 18 months?

If they didn't do either then you are talking nonsense.

The same as they are currently!

Do you think there is a warehouse full of rovers fans waiting for a new stadium before they go again? rovers have done well in exploiting their SL status to grow their fan base, AND YET THEY STILL LOSE MONEY HAND OVER FIST

rovers have been on the up for the last 4 season. I am sure we will see the true loyalty of some of these new found fans (not the 2500-3000 hardcore who stuck with them in the barron years) when thing really go pear shaped during the coming season

No set of financial statements will tell you that.

That being said its not difficult to guess who / what the current liabilities will include. There will be a fair amount of VAT owing to HMRC. There will be a fairly large amount of PAYE / NIC payable. There will be a certain amount of deferred income from season ticket sales for future matches. On the basis of the East stand extention, there will be a fair amount of monies owning for its construction. There will inevitably be a degree of directors loans. Going on past performance, you know that historically hkr have been very slow payers to their creditors leading to some small companies and business being put into their own financial difficulties, there will be a fair amount of smaller creditors who historically rovers have treated very poorly.

Depends if the direcor concerned is prepared to lose their money which they have loaned. Unless you know that for a fact, then they are very much real debt.

If ONE more Hull v HKR post is placed on this forum then I sugest locking it?

The best we can ever get is that they agree to disagree all the time even nbasics like igo Hull play in Black and white and Rovers in Red and White!!!

Anyway, I don't know what you're moaning about really, we haven't even got to the "my dads bigger than your dad" part yet!

This Dally chaps a bit of a thicky i must say.

when wakey get relegated next time think of me

yeah exactly like the potential of london.

thats why such a poor london team continues in SL.

the RFL will be way more lenient on a club with expansion potential like salford than wakey

so the SMC make the decision?

thats not what was said above.

why would SMC owners turn down another paying tennant?

does council not want to make a better return on its asset and hence encourage more tenants?