but how do you define growing the game - surely its primarily people watching it, unless you are a REAL rugby league purist who simply wants as many games to be played up and down the country even if it is infront of one man and a dog? Which is better - 100 more people playing the game in London or 10000 new fans watching it? Of course it does not have to be one or the other...but the latter certainly ain't happening!

People struggle to see the difference between spectator growth and participation growth. They are two completely different parts of the game.

Participation growth in some areas is excellent. But some clubs and RFL seem to be struggling to translate that into spectators. Not necessarily in the sense of the participants going to watch (because some just want to play), but more in the sense of the people that come down and watch these amateur and junior teams. They're already spectators.

I think the RFL needs to run some sort of campaign to get people watching the game in new areas. Although the RFL's promotion in some areas is shocking. We only need to look at the SL buils up as evidence of this...

Because dally seems to take the view that Leeds are much more succesful than "lackluster" clubs such as Leigh in attracting fans. Whilst Leeds deserve their success, they have massive advantages that most other heartland clubs could only dream about.

Go back a few years though and Bradford got higher attendences than Leeds, by a massive coincidence United were doing rather well at the time. Go and watch a Rhinos game (been twice myself - once this Boxing Day and once for the WCC against Storm) and you'll see that a lot of folk wear United merchandise to games and "Marching Together" is a United song.



Precisely. Leeds is definitely heartlands but it certainly isn't the ultimate English rugby town.

Talking of the Crusaders I've read this week about the positivity of the ticket sales for the game against Weeds Whinos. My question is which genius at the RFL/Super League decided Leeds would be a good opposition for the new franchise? They will be down by 30 at half time and lose by 60+. I don't reckon any more than a handful of those first timers will ever consider going again. A better game would have been one they had a chance of being competitive in.

No, but the annual game in the city between Skolars and Bronquins is definitely on the way up and attracting corporate money. Quins may never be a well supported side but they are making inroads in other ways.

Let's get it on.

They'd do well to change their name to London RL.

growing the game is getting it played in more schools, more amateur teams, more people aware of and involved in the game.

Im not arguing Les Catalans have grown the game in Perpignan less than Quins have in London. Just that at the time Les Catalans entered Super League London was (by almost all measures) more an RL 'heartland' than Perpignan was. More people watched it, more people played it.

Its just to point out the ridiculousness of some now pointing to Perpignan as 'always' a heartland whilst similarly decrying London.

Which shows the limited potential of heartland clubs. Leeds are much more successful because they had the potential, they then got someone able to harness it.

It isnt 'a massive' coincidence, there is barely any correlation.
who cares? Attracting other fans is a good thing. Building on the attachment people have to the city is a good thing. Its what all places should be doing

thats because there is no such thing. It is currently the Hub of rugby league in this country, no doubt that will eventually change but there is no need to bring down just how successful the game is here to excuse whats happening elsewhere.

You seem to have forgetton your long argued point that growing the game also includes getting full time proffesional clubs in more area's to bring in more potential playing talent that we currently cannot attract , you have argued with me and many others many times that we need these clubs to entice these young athletes to the sport

So having well supported proffessional clubs is just if not more important than grass roots work

i havent argued any different, by growing the amateur game London is providing us with more potential playing talent, and actually playing talent.

Quins are bringing in more playing talent, the likes of Clubb and LMS wouldnt be playing the game if it wasnt for the hardwork in youth development done down there.

Thats not to ignore quins attendance issue, Nor is it to say that the attendance issue isnt important or linked to everything else as part of the London RL package just to argue it isnt the defining aspect of the game in London.

That's all right then , wouldn't want you changing ' tack ' so to speak

Limited potential of *some* heartlands clubs but potential is often all "expansion" clubs have. You can't bank potential, you have to be able to deliver.



So you are arguing that it is not true but isn't it great?



"Bring down". I hardly think it is bringing down Leeds to point out that the likes of Cas and Wakey do very well to get attendences and teams that are remotely comparable to a big city club and don't deserve the level of criticism they get in some quarters.

]

We didn't lose by 60+ points for our first game of the season last year and that was away against Leeds