They were offered a place at the time. Unfortunately they had to decline as their fans couldn't afford the bus fare to get there.
But hey, good argument!

Yet again you reveal your lack opf knowledge about Wakefield Trinity. But why let the facts get in the way of spouting your bile against the club. The Hospitality Boxes were put up in 2000.

On what basis are Wakefield thew weakest club. Other than the ground issue what other areas are they weaker than other teams. Please give the areas of weakness compared to other teams please.

Freedom of Speech is guaranteed in law for you, it is your right above all other rights, feel free to setup a website and post what you like there, then when the civil proceedings come to you, you can prove your allegations and backup your freedom of speech in a civil court of law to your hearts content.

However you are banned from RLFANS.COM as your choice is, play by our rules, or don't post anything.

Sadofsky's have prepared a balance sheet for Rovers as at the 30th November 2008 which shows total liabilities of £3.16m. Whether this money is owed to the directors, or to trade creditors, say for maintenance work or merchandise for the shop, or to season passholders or sponsors for cash they've put in for which they've not had any consideration yet, or the bank, or whether they're accruals for services received not yet invoiced, is beside the point. The definition debt is "Duty or obligation to pay money, deliver goods, or render service under an express or implied agreement." which would cover all the above, hence from the balance sheet, the headline about Rovers having £3m of debt (at 30th November 200icon_cool.gif would seem accurate.

I think for your "Real number is only £1m" statement, when Rovers have lost a further £450k since the 2008 accounts, to be true, one of the following might have to be correct:
The directors have waived their loans
The "real number" includes asset valuations, in which case it's not a measure of debt, but a measure of net worth, which is different, and not what the HDM reported on anyway
The "real number" is a selective subset of total liabilities and therefore irrelevant due to the definition of debt mentioned above
The published balance sheet is incorrect.

income greater than expenditure = profit
income equal to expenditure = parity
Income less than expenditure = deficit/debt etc.

That I realise to some is a hard concept to grasp but work with it for a while and the concept may begin to be understood.






















There is a rumour that some banks may be considering the idea and how it works

Lock it!

hey i walked it.

a community stadium is for the whole community, east and west

crowds - lower than cas who are the other potential for expulsion. salford dont count as they offer the potential of manchester

finances - arent wakey have troubles paying tax.

its good to see you value my opinion so much

If they are in the accounts , yes they are , otherwise they could have taken them out

It was once, it is not now under the user agreement. KR where asked if they wanted to join the other two clubs at the KC and they declined. KR where given the ground that Craven park is built on for a nominal price ( £1 IIRC ) and they then sold it off to pay of debts.

The only way KR could play at the KC is[size IF[/size both City and FC agree to let them use it. If either one disagrees then it does not happen as these two are the major uses of the stadium, so thats the end of that one

Hull FC s debts are deminishing and are being serviced well by the board, they can get credit quite easily unlike another team that has to pay for everything up front and this is killing them.