Nail on head.
Just like the negotiations for the previous TV deal, BT sports (now TNT sports) were mentioned to try and persuade Sky to increase their offer, clearly, it didn't have much effect.
The real concern is that Sky now know that they can keep on repeating the deal at an ever lower rate.
Maybe we should see if Beaumont's mates have the funds to do what he threatened the other week, although it's very unlikely.

We could do worse than take advice from The NRL.

Should we take Degsey seriously enough? He did say that his 2 mates had more money falling out their ar$3 pockets than what Sly put in the whole 3 years.

It seems the draft gradings will be released this week

This thread is the typical attitude of it’s always someone else’s fault. It’s up to the clubs to build relationships with the communities they sit it, to market, to encourage fans to attend, to make it entertaining. As much as I don’t really like the bloke what DB has done with Leigh is the blue print.

We need the clubs to grab the sport by the balls and send it on an upward trajectory. What we have instead is a load of self perpetuating flat cappers with a few quid holding the game back.

This thread is the typical attitude of it’s always someone else’s fault. It’s up to the clubs to build relationships with the communities they sit it, to market, to encourage fans to attend, to make it entertaining. As much as I don’t really like the bloke what DB has done with Leigh is the blue print.

We need the clubs to grab the sport by the balls and send it on an upward trajectory. What we have instead is a load of self perpetuating flat cappers with a few quid holding the game back.

This I can agree with. But it all boils down to money, or lack of it. Marketing is expensive.

I don't think there is any Leeds fan that wouldn't agree we have been $hit for several years now. But even in those years of being $hit we have won a CC and got to a GF.

Give it a couple of years until your double glazing salesman owner will pull his money out again, and you'll be dropping back down the leagues. We won't be.

I think if Leigh had played in green and yellow, Beaumont would still have changed their name. He wanted to make Leigh HIS club.

I quite like the re-brand. It definitely grew on me as the season progressed. Beaumont has done well out of it. IN[/fimg]But that isn't going to secure the long term future of the club, or even bring anymore success. When the wins stop coming, the fanbase will drop, unless other strategies are brought into place to stop that.

'Hull Sharks' and 'Wakefield Wildcats' saw a brief uptake in interest after their rebrands, but went back to their traditional names after the novelty wore off.

Once the expensive pre-match entertainment I'd dropped, will that affect the footfall? Possibly not, as I can't see many of target demographic of 18-35 year olds being big into bands like T'Pau.

I've no issue with what Leigh have done this year, but I don't see it as future-proofing the club, or having the long term impact people think it will.

Hull Sharks was never popular, not helped by us being completely skint and bottom of the league. But in Hull a name wasnt needed, if you say you are off to watch Hull its assumed you mean FC (with Football being City) and the black and white irregular hoops was already a strong design.

Newcastle Thunder about to go under it seems, wont be many clubs left to give a grading to at this rate