Quote puroresu_boy="puroresu_boy"If a club 3500 miles away means bankruptcy then yes I would question how sustainable that business is.
I mean its not like we dont have professional teams who shudder at the thought of having to travel to Canada once and felt a need to exclude Toronto from a tiny share of television money.'"
Are you deliberately talking nonsense ?
We know that we support a game that isn't in great financial health and so we decide to add new clubs 3500 miles away, that cant play a full set of home fixtures during the regular season, (Ottawa will be slightly worse as they will be even further north), increase the cost burden for all of the existing clubs, hand over "our" players etc, etc, when there has been little to no effort so far for Toronto to begin finding their own "homegrown" players, either from the existing American RL or from Union.
The Bankruptcy (or the brink of it), if you can remember came immediately before the inception of SL, when Maurice Linsdsay of Wigan brokered a TV deal with Sky as his club, along with certain others had brought the game to it's knees.
The issue with having multiple N. American clubs, plus Catalan and Toulouse, in the comp is that they add to the costs of EVERY competing club and as I mentioned, the sport is not awash with cash, far from it.
Most businesses if things were tight, would not wish to take on additional cost, plus the loss of revenue from the lack of visiting fans etc.
Its great to look at the potential upside to all of this but, if the sport were being responsible, it would also take note of the potential downside, not least that Toronto need huge injections of cash to survive and profit seems not to be remotely neccessary or likely.