of course not

The big question for both those suggestions is where is the money to carry out the re-development going to come from? Neither really has a pot to p in with Cas some £2.3m in debt to directors and Wake already have a 180% mortgage (£3.15m) on their ground.

Of course it's nonsense, because you were suggesting that Wakefield were involved in "smoke and mirrors" during the franchising era.

So, in your world, Wakefield Council spent a lot of money on devising a stadium and development in Thornes Park, including a detailed feasibility study, just so a rugby league club in the city could fool the RFL, this being a council headed by a Castleford season ticket holder. At the same time, the club owner sold Belle Vue to a company he was involved in, on the assumption that the development would go ahead (and it did look nailed on), as he could then make a profit on it, which led to the club going into administration ultimately. Just to fool the RFL.

Also in your world, a developer builds a huge development by the M62, after the Secretary of State ordered a public inquiry, just so that a rugby club could fool the RFL.

Yep, nonsense. But let's not spoil your delusions.

It has and was costing a fortune in rent to 88M and before that bank of Ireland & that's why we managed to get the stadium and the land that surrounds it into the Clubs ownership, so we can develop it and start earning money out of the place, more than the 14 home games or whatever it is.

Carter's brought in a new Director/owner to deal totally with getting Belle Vue redeveloped in sections. The first sectionto be done, as you hint at is the bigger east stand that runs from Donny Road, then the full length of the pitch and beyond., The old stand plus where the Superbowl and car park used to beis giving is the size we need to turn it into something worthy of the City and RL. Where apart from beating seating etc, there's going to be much improved corporate, bars and restaurants,, gym as well I think, as well other things like class rooms etc. According to a recent interviews with said director, planning permission is just about ready to go in, probably after Christmas for that stage of the development, it could have been sooner but apparently things like Brexit and then a GE has taken priority.Because it will be done in stages we won't be moving out, & it will start hopefully at the end of this next season and then the rest in off seasons in the future.

Also those artists impression were done by a company that owned the stadium before we did called 88M, that were trying to get in on the act, where they were going to build a stadium plus, student accommodation and others shops. Nothing to do with Trinity. Just like Newmarkets architects drawings that got planning permission for and also rubber stamped down in Westminster, contrary to what that complete WUM rolling turd says, that's another set of proposed pictures nothing to do with Trinity, just those using the club to get there fingers on about a 100m pounds of green belt land.

The WUM knows he's talking crap because he's done it all before and been proved wrong that somehow Trinity keep making stores up and keep having pictures drawn up just to fool everyone. I mean seriously what kind of plonker would even suggest such a thing, simply because it's so bizarre and secondly it's all so easy to prove wrong. I mean we've had not that long ago a number of back and fourths between the Council and the Club about the Newmarket project, I suppose that dude thinks it was fake news orchestrated by Trinity for some reason.

You have to feel for clubs like Wakey, Castleford and especially Salford. The latter flogged their home and are now tenants at a ground that just doesn't do it in terms of attracting fans to it. The other lot still only manage 6,500 there, Salford just over half that number...it holds 12k but ever will until transport to and from it is improved. I find it hard to believe that if still at the Willows, Salford would be getting 3k gates....
...back to the issue of grounds being up to standard, London were given permission to play in a sub-standard facility in 2019. If the RFL/SL had allowed clbs to upgrade back in the licensing period, I suspect BV and the Jungle would be better grounds now than they currently are with hundreds of thousands wasted on "planning"

The RFL/SL stopped clubs upgrading their stadiums???? Do you mean MADE? As usual, the clubs themselves chose to spend their money on players rather than infrastructure.

Should build and share a stadium with Wakey. Simple.
Both grounds are dumps with Wakeys the bigger dump.

And your is a empty soulless shell

happy now

If it's so simple maybe you could
1 say where it will be built, and, probably most importantly,
2 how it will be funded?

If they said to both clubs build a new stadium or lose your Super League status I'm pretty sure they would find the right location and funding

You still haven’t said where to build it, and how to fund building a shared stadium.