I'll leave that up to you to eventually work that out.....

Super League's audience drive Dacia's and Skoda's don't they??

I'll give you a clue. It doesn't.

If the answer to our sponsorship problems is to follow the chairman of a club that posted a £680k loss due to lost sponsors, I dread to think what the question is.

Completely agree - that was the point I was try to make, that the criticism was misdirected.

How about wording it in a way that that is not designed to provoke and annoy, thats why im guessing it was removed..

Translation - “We have no clue so avoid giving an answer”

That's open to interpretation.
Shame we don't have a lawyer among us.

Possibly. Dare to provide an answer?

I said in another thread that we need another Packer versus Murdock set too.

Well im not trading my Jag in if /when Leigh get to SL.

Not exactly a fear of expansion but I do worry where the players in an expanded league will come from.

It's analogous to the standard of trolling on here. Once, there was only the occasional troll who had the pick of the best topics and whose material tended to be refreshing and novel. There were many biters.
Now, the troll number (or perhaps their aliases) has increased but the available subject matter has not. This means that the new kids on the block, akin to the Toulouses and Torontos of this world, are of a relatively weak standard compared to the leaders in their field. In itself, this wouldn't be a bad thing but the sad fact of the matter is that their efforts now actually undermine the efforts of their betters resulting in a drop off in standards right across the board.

You haven’t asked a question.