Quote caslad75="caslad75"Rugby AM might not be everybody's cup of tea and is a little cringeworthy at times, but at least they are doing a show and getting it out on free to air national TV, plus coverage of the NCL. Comparing it to The Footy Show, which has a massive financial budget, is comparing apples to oranges. SKY should be producing a show to compete with The Footy Show, but what are they doing? Naff all since they got rid of Boots n'All.'"
Fully Agree!
I don’t mind Rugby Am and think this series has been a massive improvement. As I’ve said before, I’m easily pleased.
I’m quite surprised by some of the comments on here though, some quite snobbish. There is no money and a significant lack of coverage in Rugby League in this country, so I think Rugby AM should be applauded for trying to do something about it. A show about our sport, for the fans by the fans.
And to compare it to The NRL Footy Show is laughable. A show funded by a major broadcaster. Of course, it’s going to be better.
So what if Alex Simmons isn’t the best presenter in the world. At least he’s doing something. And Wagga is mental. Yet he’s like that in real life. Real people. Shock horror. What will people think!
And off the back of Rugby AM this year has been the televising of the NCL games and the War of the Roses which is brilliant for the sport. To be an amateur player and have a chance to play on TV must be unreal.
Bar the SL Show which is really just a highlights show what else is there? For me Rugby AM is doing a great job and can only get better.