For me, Greenwood being charged was in response to the Sneyd incident last week. If the Sneyd incident hadn't happened, does anybody really think Greenwood would have even been charged?

I'm all for protecting players but this is just getting ridiculous if Greenwood is banned.

Common sense must prevail.

Your original fore was this.



Still narked that some hardliners were baying for no absolution

.

But I still think you have your “Black & White” glasses on when comparing the two incidents

.

People aren't bias because they're saying their's nothing wrong with it.....because their was nothing wrong with it.

The only bias seems to be coming from Hull fans highlighting it and trying to make some comparision to poor little Marc who was picked on by everyone on here who rightfully thought his was bad. Just like they tried to shift the spotlight/blame onto McGuire and McDermott last week, they now are trying to shift some onto the RFL if they don't ban Greenwood like they banned poor little Marc even though everyone non-Hull doesn't think their's anything wrong with the tackle.

Lol the hypocrisy here is hilarious.

It was a little bit sarcastic my first post, I never thought he should get 10 games, as I have repeated Sneyd is much worst and deserved a ban, but I was also right in saying that there is something wrong with Greenwoods tackle and should be looked at.

He might get not guilty and I wouldn't be bothered but the RFL have done the right thing in calling him up (Although the grading is maybe a little harsh).

Hull fans? It's only me, I have never once said that Sneyd was picked on, in fact I thought he got away with it slightly and should have had 3 games.

The non Hull FC, RFL think they is something wrong with it, plus a couple more on here, so it's not just Hull fans.

I also never blamed Mcguire or Mcdermott, in fact I praised Mcguire for his attitude after the event.

It wasn't as bad, but it was an illegal challenge that could have caused damage to Brown (See his reaction) and deserves to be called up.

I think its just as bad that Leeds fans are still upset because Sneyd didn't get his 8-10 game ban.

What hypocrisy, please explain?

I said Sneyd deserved a ban, around 3 games, I was (Just about) right.

I said Greenwoods tackle needed looking at, I was right.

I can see the challenge isn't as bad.

Dave K does seem to be a very unusual occurrence - a reasonable, level headed FC supporter !

You claim others are looking at this with a lot of bias.

However, because your player got banned, you want to see another player banned for tackle that LOOKED similar but ACTUALLY it wasn't, far from it.

No club bias from you?

If you say so, lets see what happens tonight, to see if the RFL think it was similar?

"lancashire" team gets a "home" semi final shock