Err it really is…

The VT code of denial continues ever thus.

What Ganson did is unheard of - whether he was right regarding the refs performance is a matter of opinion but it's not happened before as far as anyone I've spoken to knows. So why start now, especially with your home town club as the beneficiary - come on it looks terrible by anybodies standard.

As far as I was aware the match official was and always has been the man in charge of the match from start to finish - at which point his performance is then reviewed - you and your fellow apologists please tell us when this changed?

This weekend I assume!

Another week in which the sport is dragged closer to being the team sport equivalent of Wrestling.

How does Richard Agar know Roby was given a ‘dressing down’?

Why do you think?

Because the refs dressing room is right next to the players and the partitions trust me are flimsy and as such a "dressing down" can easily be heard. I grant you the content may be sketchy but I reckon you'd get the gist.

That’s not quite what was said, Agar said
[i"Apparently Steve Ganson has entered the referee's dressing room at half-time and has given him a good old-fashioned dressing down.

"I'm not sure that is in his remit. I'd have liked to have been a fly on the wall."[/i

Which would indicate he doesn’t really know what, if anything was said, nor that he has first hand knowledge Ganson even went in to referees changing room.

Seems a bit of Chinese Whispers mixed with a little perception bias to me.

If we accept Ganson has the role he has, then we accept he is doing it entirely impartially and if he did visit the referee at half-time it was entirely within his capacity as match officials coach and technical director.

Whatever Smokey, in you're world of denial I accept this would be totally acceptable.

Twist and shout old boy, you play on semantics all you want, it's your stock in trade.



Please don't bother with a long winded reply, your mind regarding Wakefield is made up long before you hear the issue so no point discussing it is there.

Err it really isn't (this could go on some time)





There's a good book somewhere in that title. "Code of denial", ffs




No, what Ganson did is not actually known, not the specifics. The only thing that appears to be "known" is the refs' boss spoke to one of his charges for some reason at half time.


And you can feck right off with your "apologists" crap too, stick it with your risible "code of denial". When did I claim any such change?? Do you actually read posts you respond to? My position is pretty much identical to Agar's, in this quote:

I'd agree it would seem sensible for Ganson/RFL to put out a brief statement given the extreme conspiracy theories that are about, with the caveat that whatever they said would of course be dismissed by conspiracy theorists.

you are funny vastpants, i cant decide whether you are an Alan Partridge level of satire or just unintentionally hilarious.

Why dont you get another petition together, the RFL, Ashley Klein, now Steve Ganson are all after you............

Team boring is back in town I see, just need adeybull to make the hat trick.

Faced with the soaring heights of your intellect, your cutting edge contributions and your deep and unrivalled insights we need some boring as a counterpoint. I mean, gratuitous jibes at posters not even on the thread, that's just what the forum needs more of. Well done you.

Haven't we just been through all this on another thread - it's not me luv it's you, you're simply a dreadful human being, people keep telling you but you're not listening.

Funny isn't it (or hilarious as you'd say), when accusation or point are made that don't suit you're SL apologist stance those involved are derided as paranoid nutters with no valid argument. Just how most fascists bullies or crass pseudo intellectuals behave - North Korea or New Labour is probably the place for you. I can see you peddling the party line and burning all dissenters as heretics. Corruption exists in all walks of life so why this imbecilic desire to kid us that RL is any different - give it a rest for all our sakes.

[size=50NB: Predict "hissy fit" as first and most predictable line of defence.[/size

Struggling to see what the issue is, storm in a tea cup.

Clearly not, it's obviously a big conspiracy and if you don't agree your a pseudo intellectual as is common on in North Korea apparently.

As we all know, the major problem facing North Koreans is of course pseudo intellectuals.