Unfortunately a team full of superstars doesn’t always work.

But a team full of what you’ve got at Salford doesn’t always work either. What you need is a good mix rather than everyone been the best that’s on offer.

Ryan Bailey has won a lot of trophies with Leeds and we couldn’t of done it without him. He hasn’t been sensational by any means, but he’s been stable.

A good mix is what we need - not a Galacticos Real Madrid type side.

I don't think we're 'clueless' as it stands at the moment.

The side is very young, with a host of both experienced (Peacock/Morley/Bridge/McGuire/Pryce etc..) and decent young talent (Eastmond/Shenton/etc..) missing from the team.

We started well and held on at the end. The Aussies had a purple patch spurred on by the try that shouldn't have been given. We also had two tries that could have been taken, given a bit more luck.

I think we keep on an even course. Hopefully the youngsters will improve and the experienced players will be available for next year. A few more players will come through. Bradford, my team, have a decent crop of young players. Particularly Donaldson and Whitehead could be pushing for the international squad if they have a good season. Other posts have mentioned other young players coming through.

When you think that, just from Bradford, Lynch, Scruton, Langley, Sykes and Goodwin justifiably didn't make the cut, it shows that we are begining to get strength in depth at international level and competition for places. We put out a competitive international team without the above mentioned players.

I think Eastmond and Pryce were missed today. We could have done with another player that can make breaks. It would have taken some heat of Tomkins, who IMO was marked out of the game by the Aussies.

BTW, I always liked Robinson. I remember him tearing St Helens apart for Wigan when he was just coming in to the first team. I never understood why Wigan gave up on him so early.

Most of the England squad today weren’t superstars. However they were the best we had to offer considering the players that have retired from the international set up and the players we have injured.

So in a sense of things they were the superstars of English selection. Steve McNamara choose the best that was at his disposal and it didn’t work. Mind you it hasn’t worked for any coach for many years unless you call the 2007 series win over New Zealand a success.

What we need is a coach that can put together a game plan to beat the best in the world regardless of the players at his disposal. You only have to Look at how Michael Maguire has turned Wigan from the third best side in the country to the very best despite having pretty much the same personnel.

Tim Sheens can work on limit resources - why can’t Steve McNamara?

What we need is someone who can turn the third best side in the world into the first best side in the world with pretty much the same squad. If we can’t get that then its time to give some of the more ‘unglamorous’ players of super league a chance to shine for England. You only have to look at the top three sides and I bet you can pick a squad of ‘average’ players from them that’d qualify for England.

Its these average players that make up the team. Its superstars that are the icing on the cake. Too much icing with very little cake to support it, is England’s problem IMO.



Its been done and it hasn’t worked.

However I agree that its time for Morley to say bye bye to the England set up.

I'm more interested in where the 25-28 year old players are? Why are we having to throw so many young, under prepared kids into the backline?

i personally dont think its all doom and gloom for me most of the backline should be perserved with its been far better than the last 2 games down under against the aussies, yes the young lads made a few errors but with a few more games under the belt at this level we have every chance of doing well in the next world cup.

Seems like the sky sports agenda is sinking through of giving youngsters a chance. Anyone older than 23 is passed it if you listen to Eddie or Stevo..

couldn't agree more - I don't really have too much criticism of the present english squad and I thought Mc Banana did well to ring the changes but we were beaten by the better team,that's clear tho' when you take into account the very dubious decisions (i'm trying to be polite !) plus the serious errors by international players I don't actually believe we are far behind the top two teams in the world.I don't believe the aussies were any more than 6 - 8 points better than us on the day

Full Back - Tomkins should be Englands full back for years to come. Cudjoe and Widdop are good back ups.

Wings - Fox, Hall, foster, Goulding, Cudjoe on their day can be very very good wingers, particularly Hall. I think he needs to rediscover some pace though. Im a very big fan of Cudjoe too. Widdop could also play wing, but he needs first grade rugby either over there or by coming back to England.

Centre - The sooner Hull start playing Briscoe at centre the better. He has the potential to be outstanding in that position. For me Shenton proved that he can potentially make the step up.

Stand off - For me Eastmond can step into the stand off role and could be devastating from that position. Obviously there is the option of playing Tomkins, but Eastmond is the #1 choice for me.

Scrum Half - Is a problem position for me. We need a scrum half to organise and Kick to allow the likes of Eastmond and Tomkins express themselves. Do we have one anywhere? No is the answer to that, so I'd be tempted to play sinfield in that role until one is found or Michael Dobson gains residency.

Props- The current incumbents are pretty strong + Liam Watts from Hull KR.

Hooker - Roby will benefit from been #1 at Sts. I also like Houghton from Hull and Lunt, but I think the days of interchange hookers are pretty much gone so id go with Roby for 80.

Back row - Again Ellis + Burgess are the 2 best 2nd rowers in the world so no problems there. If we cant find an organising 7, i'd be tempted to play Sinfield at 13 to play that role but Ive warmed to O'Loughlin and think he could make that position his own for a few years to come.

Whatever team we pick though. They would all have to be at their best on their day to beat the Kiwis and Aussies which is the difference for me.

So near yet, so far.

Unfortunately I do think that we’re far behind Australia. But we are more than capable at beat New Zealand on our own turf. Just a shame we can’t replicate that down under!

How people can believe Sam Tomkins has cemented a starting England position on this tour is beyond me.

yes he hasn;t done anything of any note. I've been underwhelmed after hearing him talked up all season. Behind that pack any back with 1/2 a skill should be able to shine.