After their 2008 World cup campaign no one could accuse any England players of taking performance enhancing drugs.

In a way it's a pity they didn't.

They were truly shocking.




Unless it was Keith Senior and Viagra

yer he can come bk june 23rd

IIRC from the pictures of that rank bint he went with no wonder he had to take viagra, she was enough to make it bend inwards.

The ban length is dictated by WADA not the RFL. They bought into the system which is necessary to tap into government funds etc so their hands are tied.

Drugs are drugs, And when you are someone who kids look up to any kind of lapse with regards to taking them should be punished Harshly.

My 5 year old Worships the ground Anthony Thackeray walks on atm, and is at the stage where thats who he want's to be when he's older. Now if players in that position get caught out doing something like drugs then they should be dealt with in as strong a sense as possible. If not then our kids see them get away with it, and it becomes something almost acceptable to them.

Let hock rot for the rest of his ban, When he comes back he will either be a better person for it or he will revert back to his bad habits. If that happens it should result in a lifetime Ban.

And anyone in a Pro Sport caught taking drugs ( Either Performance enhancing or recreational ) should be punished at every opportunity and with the maximum ban possible. Its the only way to deter players and kids alike from following in their footsteps.

no he would'nt.....he'd have got his hands slapped and probably a fine for possession

Punishing a sportsman who takes a recreational drug in the same way you punish a sportsman who takes a performance enhancing drugs makes absolutely zero sense.

Hock took an illegal drug and should have been reported to the relevant authorities, only a punishment of bringing the sport into disrepute should have to be considered.

Where's Gareth Raynor's two year ban? Chev Walker's? Ben Cockayne's? Ryan Bailey's? The list of people breaking the laws of the land is too long, it seems nonsensical that an offence that doesn't directly harm another human being and has no criminal penalty results in a two year ban from earning a living, but beating people up in the streets and ripping people off gets absolutely zero punishment from the sport.

Excellent point actually

Whether or not they were performance enhancing, he was found to have taken a class A controlled substance. That, for me, is far more serious than somebody who has "taken a chance" with HgH.

b*ll*xs....

one is cheating the sport the other is just cheating himself

As a few people have already said HGH is classed as a 'performance enhancing drug' when you are a professional rugby league player.

Therefore taking it is classified as cheating.


Having a toot on a Friday night wont make you play rugby league any better... in fact if anything it can impair your performance.

he knew what would happen to him if caught, so he must take the punishment. its DRUGS what ever form he took it.

So are many other things, but players don't get two year bans for taking Ibuprofen or having a pint do they?

I've no doubt that he knew the potential consequences of his actions, and I have no sympathy for that, but the rules make no sense and should be changed.

Or we could move away from the currently illogical stance on drugs and make them legal instead.....