The interpretation by each ref been different

The video referee should be allowed, as in australia, to pass back the decision to the referee as ref's call. Many times the ref goes to the video ref 'just to confirm or be absolutely sure' what he believes was/was not a try. When then he does go to the video ref then many times the quality of the slow motion (frame jumping) or obstruction from the other players prevents a definitive decision being made, but he HAS to make one even though the referee was very close to the action and as stated earlier in my post he already has a good opinion if it was in fact a try or not.

Maybe a way around this would be give the video ref the chance to view the footage as happens now. Give him a max of 2mins and if no decision in that time he then communicates with the referee and either says he cannot make a decision or he believes it 'almost' certainly is (or not) a try based on the limited view he had and the referee then can make the decision from the info from the video ref combined with his own view.

the fact that scrums are still been used

Catch a kick on the full behind your tryline its an immediate 20m restart.
Catch a grubber behind your line and you have to get out or face a dropout.

Why?

Er... One of the newer rules says that you get the ball back if you kick if out straight from a 20 metre restart (obviously ball needs to land in-field first). Unless it's been removed, but i had it done to me twice last season.

I don't like this dragging a person out is a penalty, and i've never been a big fan of the 40/20.

I disagree with that. A quick tap from a penalty is fair enough because it's a punishment but not from a dead ball situation. There is sufficient advantage with taking it from the 20.

Far from simple really. It would be impossible to tell whether the ball was just lost or whether it was an attempted pass. We'd be in another of those did `he play at it or not situations` which are a nightmare as it is. Not only that you'd finish up with players not risking the off-load in case it went to ground and was called a knock on, which would mean more one out football.

We have a winner. Punishes bad defence as much as it rewards a good kick. If you find touch in the oppositions 20 you have gained good field position which is reward enough.

"international" rules aka if you dont play our way we wont play at all, boohoo, wah wah, the kiwis beat us again we cant give the english a chance etc

Needless over use of the vr! For crossing ect that's the refs job if he can't do it why have him just have a vr with a hooter and a megaphone to bark the calls. SL 1984

For me it's the rule that French clubs need to appear in the 2010 Grand Final to get into Super League.

Meow saucer of milk for 1