Leeds dropped the ball twice, and got the decision both times. Scored off both of them sets and Toulouse players heads went. Leeds are never winning by that margin if those big calls aren’t made, totally different game.

I predicted weeks ago that the first time a decision went in Leeds favour people would start claiming RFL corruption. Simple minded fans so easy to predict.

last week Warrington scored off a forward pass. we had one wrongly ruled out for a forward pass. that's sport. some days you get the luck. some you don't. any talk of corruption is stupid and petty

How about a constructive argument against my point rather than a simple minded response?

because it doest deserve a response. how about responding to my post about things going against us last week

I can’t see how the ref could have possibly affected the outcome of last weeks game. Leeds looked like a poor lower table team happy to be there as Warrington went through the motions.

but at the time it was close.i agree we wouldn't have won.
but as I said that's sport. sometimes you get decisions. sometimes you don't. that happens to every team

Let's hope for a fair middle 8's. So far, the ref's don't appear to have been given an RFL agenda.

Fax game will be interesting. As Toronto need 'fast-tracking'. I'll report back.

I heard a little ditty being recited in Carcassone this evening:

[iThere is an old man named Hewer
Whose mind is a moral sewer
All that he needs
Is a honey from Leeds
for decisions against Leeds to be fewer[/i

You're the one branding the RFL as corrupt just because Leeds won a game (by 26 points by the way) you were eager to see them lose. And you want people to have a constructive argument over such a deluded theory?

All teams get decisions going against them. Conceding an erroneous penalty or an erroneous scrum doesn't mean you concede a try and doesn't mean you lose the game.

Lowly Leeds trounce Tired Toulouse !