Eloquently put.


Definitely a penalty try on bachelor for me.

That disgusting disgrace tonight is all the proof you need.

They hate us and can’t stand us being in the top 8.

That was a disgrace.i

I’m absolutely so sick of this 3. You all hate us so think it’s a laugh.

I ducking hate you all scum bags. Stick your saints up your ar53.

.

Like when Lyne quite clearly put the ball down before regaining his feet to win a penalty which resulted in the try that took you ahead? Or the penalty Johnstone won for a “high shot” that was identical to one Taia received on the set before which led to the try before that and started the role that Wakefield got on? All of these things even themselves out over the course of a match.

As for the Taia decision - if not a try, it’s a sin bin for a head shot on Lomax off the ball. I actually think Child gave the try to avoid that decision.

I get Sky want to get controversy, but I don’t think Saints would have won a Sky game this year “if” not for reffing decisions.

Edit: that’s not to say that Wakefield didn’t deserve to push us all the way and played their part in a great game of rugby that I’m sure was great for the neutrals.

But the video ref isn't there for penalties is he? He is there for suspect tries, however.

I'm calling bull5h1t on that; a penalty try all day long that somehow became just a penalty, and a clear as you like double movement that should never have been a try - they do not, under any circumstances, get netted off by a couple of questionable high shots.

I don't like complaining about referees, but Mr Child is hardly shy of using the VR - why on earth he chose not for those incidents, is beyond my comprehension.

Cool theory, but Child gave the try because he's inept, same with the Batchelor one.

He should be stood down, but the damage is done, so what's the point.

Try watching what's happening on the grass.

Don't make me go to the Shudds board for my ray of sunshine.

We can't seem to get the big calls out of Child when its tight, don't think the home crowd is helping but that's one of the advantages a home game I guess.
I thought the penalties were pretty even, you win some you lose some for both sides, but the biggies that really count are passing us by.
Saints played their usual game and looked strong everywhere, Percival was a bit under but miles better than he was for England.
Generally I thought they came good despite the upset of a few big players being in Denver the week before.
But it does highlight the obvious, Saints ain't all that and still have good potential to win FA besides the hubcap.

Please don't get drawn in by Wexford. He is not a Wakefield Trinity fan and is trying to make us look bad.

Jesus wept. Wakefield played well and are a good team. Stop whinging about everyone else you were unlucky and on another day would have won against the best team in the league.

Not good enough
You flying around batting fires out all over the forum is not the best use of your time, sheet, it must be hard enough sweeping up after the non fraudulent dingbats.
Its time this forum imposed some kind of accountability for what is posted.....or, just ban the account.