|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 1214 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2013 | Oct 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'd like to see less teams in the playoffs, I think it really devalues the competition when more than half of the league is in it. It should be the top 6 at the very very most.
I'd also like to see more recognition for the league leaders because it's much more of an achievement that winning a few games in a knockout competition.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 48326 | Castleford Tigers |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2023 | Oct 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Eden="Eden"I'd also like to see more recognition for the league leaders'"
How? They get a trophy, despite not being champions, atm - how would give them more recognition?
... actually, just read Hear Ye's post above
Quote EdenThe League Leaders Shield should also have far more importance...as mentioned by others, the team that have played the best all year WILL finish top...so they should in my opinion go straight to the GF...with the remaining 4 or 6 teams (depending on whether its a Top 5 or Top 7 system) involved in a play off system to reach the final. That way far more importance can be placed on the effort of finishing in 1st position.'"
That's an interesting idea (subject to whether it's an advantage or disadvantage to wait 2, 3 or 4 weeks between you last league game and the title game)
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 10000 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Nov 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote tb="tb"How? They get a trophy, despite not being champions, atm - how would give them more recognition?
... actually, just read Hear Ye's post above
That's an interesting idea (subject to whether it's an advantage or disadvantage to wait 2, 3 or 4 weeks between you last league game and the title game)'"
That's one way, but like you say the wait can often be a disadvantage as well as an advantage.
If we had an extended WCC, then we can at least reward them with a place in that. But other than a greater advantage in the play-offs or more money, there's not much they can get at the moment. (Although I think the trophy could be better than a tiny hub-cap!)
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 10000 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Nov 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Wellsy13="Wellsy13"...there's not much they can get at the moment. (Although I think the trophy could be better than a tiny hub-cap!)'"
Just to reiterate this point, look at the FA Community Shield (a minor trophy), the NRL Minor Premiership (an equivalent trophy) and the SL LLS for comparison:

|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 1214 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2013 | Oct 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote tb="tb"How? They get a trophy, despite not being champions, atm - how would give them more recognition?'"
It's a tough one because I think a lot of it comes down to people's perception of it, but maybe that can be changed. Everything about it at the moment seems to be very watered down in terms of the sheild, the celebrations and the reporting of the winners.
For a start, the sheild looks absolutely pants when compared to the Challenge Cup and Grand Final silverware. I think it should be a trophy rather than a shield and should look much better than it currently does.
When Warrington won it, there wasn't all that much fuss made about it despite being the hardest to achieve. When we showed it off at the next home game, the celebrations weren't even close to anything like when we won the Challenge Cup. I felt like more of a show should have been put on.
I'd like to see it highlighted more by RL media too. For example on the Super League website, it has a list of the past Grand Final winners. I'm not sure there's anything that lists who the winners of the LLS were. It should be highlighted and have it's own section.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 512 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2020 | Nov 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Out of interest, here are the points margins by the winners of the first past the post system in RL thus far. It's important to contextualise the Wigan wins at the end of the list, and compensate the part-time playing deficiency all the other teams had, that is now, sort of, levelled out by the salary cap.
1973-74 Salford by 1pt
1974-75 St Helens by 11pts
1975-76 Salford by 1pt
1976–77 Featherstone Rovers by 5pts
1977–78 Widnes by 6pts
1978–79 HKR by 2pts
1979–80 Bradford Northern by 1pt
1980–81 Bradord Northern by 2pts
1981–82 Leigh by 2pts
1982–83 Hull FC by 4pts
1983–84 HKR by 1pt
1984–85 HKR by 3pts
1985–86 Halifax by 1pt
1986–87 Wigan by 15pts
1987-88 Widnes by 4pts
1988-89 Widnes by 3pts
1989–90 Wigan by 4pts
1990–91 Wigan by 2pts
1991–92 Wigan by 12pts
1992–93 Wigan by 0pts (points difference with St Helens)
1993-94 Wigan by 0pts (points difference with Bradford Northern and Warrington)
1994-95 Wigan by 7pts
1995-96 Wigan by 8pts
1996 St Helens by 1pt
1997 Bradford by 7pts
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 10000 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Nov 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| And here's the same for the Premier League for comparison:
92/93 - Man Utd by 10pts
93/94 - Man Utd by 8pts
94/95 - Blackburn by 1pt
95/96 - Man Utd by 4pts
96/97 - Man Utd by 7pts
97/98 - Arsenal by by 1pt
98/99 - Man Utd by 1pt
99/00 - Man Utd by 18pts
00/01 - Man Utd by 10pts
01/02 - Arsenal by 7pts
02/03 - Man Utd by 5pts
03/04 - Arsenal by 11pts
04/05 - Chelsea by 12pts
05/06 - Chelsea by 8pts
06/07 - Man Utd by 6pts
07/08 - Man Utd by 2pts
08/09 - Man Utd by 4pts
09/10 - Chelsea by 1pt
10/11 - Man Utd by 9pts
11/12 - Man City by 0pts
6 out of 20 seasons have gone to the last day.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 27757 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2021 | May 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Wellsy13="Wellsy13"6 out of 20 seasons have gone to the last day.'"
Also worth pointing out that the last 13 Super Leagues have all gone down to the very last game with both teams facing each other in that last clash. A couple of them have gone down to the final five or ten minutes as well before the game was decided, not to mention those playoff clashes which were similarly determined in closing minutes e.g. Wide to West, Carney vs Leeds.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1923 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Jan 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote tb="tb"How? They get a trophy, despite not being champions, atm - how would give them more recognition?
... actually, just read Hear Ye's post above
That's an interesting idea (subject to whether it's an advantage or disadvantage to wait 2, 3 or 4 weeks between you last league game and the title game)'"
I really don't see why we can't manage that potential disadvantage, tbh. In fact, let's ask ourselves why there needs to be up to a 4 week gap between the last round of SL and the GF.
Here's a proposition:
1st Place = Bye to Final
2nd Place = Bye to SF
3rd & 4th = QF
This year it would look something like this:
Sun 9th Sep: last game of SL
Wed 12th Sep: QF
Sat 15th Sep: SF
Sat 22nd Sep: GF
This would make becoming champions increasingly harder the lower down the table you finish, with 3rd and 4th place having to play a hugely intensive run of games to reach the GF. It would also make the playoffs more intense and exciting, knockouts at every stage, with the last 4 games of the season occurring over the space of a fortnight (last w/e of SL and GF being bookends of the fortnight), a packed festival of RL if marketed correctly, as opposed to the long, drawn out, convoluted and unintensive playoff series we have now.
Of course this may be fodder for the tin-hat pile of RL theories. 
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 10000 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Nov 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote TheElectricGlidingWarrior="TheElectricGlidingWarrior"I really don't see why we can't manage that potential disadvantage, tbh. In fact, let's ask ourselves why there needs to be up to a 4 week gap between the last round of SL and the GF.
Here's a proposition:
1st Place = Bye to Final
2nd Place = Bye to SF
3rd & 4th = QF
This year it would look something like this:
Sun 9th Sep: last game of SL
Wed 12th Sep: QF
Sat 15th Sep: SF
Sat 22nd Sep: GF
This would make becoming champions increasingly harder the lower down the table you finish, with 3rd and 4th place having to play a hugely intensive run of games to reach the GF. It would also make the playoffs more intense and exciting, knockouts at every stage, with the last 4 games of the season occurring over the space of a fortnight (last w/e of SL and GF being bookends of the fortnight), a packed festival of RL if marketed correctly, as opposed to the long, drawn out, convoluted and unintensive playoff series we have now.
Of course this may be fodder for the tin-hat pile of RL theories.
'"
But then the 1st placed team isn't going to play for 3 weeks after their final game. The team they play will be battle-hardened. It's not always a benefit to have time off.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 488 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Just an idea.
The league leaders are crowned SL champions and the top 4 go into the end of season playoffs with the NRL top 4 for the world club challenge.
You get the extended world club challenge everybody wants, more meaningful league fixtures but keeping a playoff system and possible last day excitment.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 10000 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Nov 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote jarvis12345="jarvis12345"Just an idea.
The league leaders are crowned SL champions and the top 4 go into the end of season playoffs with the NRL top 4 for the world club challenge.
You get the extended world club challenge everybody wants, more meaningful league fixtures but keeping a playoff system and possible last day excitment.'"
Main stumbling block would obviously be the Aussies agreeing to it, which they wouldn't as they'd lose their show-piece event once every other year (a Grand Final).
After that, it'd be the logistics of such large travelling distances over a short period of time. Would they have to travel from one side of the world to the other every week? Or would they sacrifice home advantage?
It's an idea, and one that I've mullered over in the past. But it's not in our power to decide, which means therefore nothing will come of it!
|
|
|
 |
|