He's another who can't put his club feelings behind him, I wonder if there would be more support if JJB played for Wakey and not Leeds.

You're easily offended then!

So Burgess, Brough, Hock shouldn't even be afforded the opportunity?

Watkins, Hardacre, Lomax don't deserve the chance to step up in two years time at the World Cup?

We might as well give up then because there's no one else n the horizon and those I named are proven to be not good enough.

Obviously I have a problem with Leeds that's why I've named two Leeds p,ayers as possible replacements!

I suggest you and Old Faithfull get your heads from up your s.

Well hock and burgess have both played in previous losing international sides, so by your logic - NO LONGER REQUIRED.

Brough has played for scotland so can't start playing for us now. He nailed his colours to the scottish mast, we don't want him.

Watkins, hardacre and lomax, may or may not be good enough. To be continued....

In a word NO!

Your small mindedness might limit your ability to see beyond club colours but don't project that onto me, ta.

But neither Burgess or Hock are approaching their mid thirties and neither have looked old and laboured in this series.

we after look at jonny lomax and burgess but other than that i wouldnt change too much.

watching the game tonight the aussies looked like a club side they all knew their job and plyed the same set patterns all night and the kick chase was fantastic,this imo is brought about because the fundamentals of the side doesnt change too much over the years lockyer,thurston,smith have been the backbone of this side for years,imagine if they chopped and changed after every loss.

every few years they introduce one or two new faces and im sure cooper cronk will now become a fixture in the side in lockyers absence but very little else changes from year on year until someone retires,we need the same approach and making wholsale changes isnt going to help.

You named 2 young inexperienced leeds players to cover your clear anti leeds bias.

They've not had much 1st team action so you've not had chance to build up a hatred.

That's it! You're a wakefield fan aren't you??

I wouldn't disagree that brough must feel hard done to not to be selected. But he hasn't exactly stood up and performed in big games when it's needed has he?

Yeah and neither are wilkin and JJB!!

But then they play for bigger, more successful, teams.

Don't think hock is anywhere near the England team!!

Yes, as someone who has mentioned that Yeaman, who plays for my club, isn't good enough is unable to see beyond club colours. Then again, we can't really test the theory with regards to your bias as there was no reps from Wakefield out there tonight.

FFS!
Do you really believe that?

There are now almost two years before we play another meaningfully game as England, do you think Hardacre and Watkins might gain a little more experience in these two years.
On the other side of the coin do you believe that Peacock and JJB will be better players when they're two years older?

Not that it even comes into it, well not for me anyway but....
No Sherlock!
What gave it away? Was the avatar of a Wakefield shirt that accompanies all my posts.

I like Yeaman, I like Hull FC, and I don't think Yeaman has let anyone down in this series but he's limited and we need better.

I was happy to see Westwood and Ellis out there tonight, both products of Wakefield Trinity.

Talk about clutching at straws. Warrington, leeds and west tigers are the reason those players are as good as they are.

Not wakefield.