the idea of fumbles counting as knock ons and allowing stripping both create the same problem, it would stop the promotion of the ball for offloads or risky passes and leave the game stuck as five drives and a kick. It would be the worst idea ever.

as for rules i would bring in, 2 refs is the obvious one, right now i think the ruck is a mess and a lottery. I would also like to see an automatic 5 minutes in the sin bin for any and all high tackles.

As a couple of more drastic changes i would look at trialling just to see how it works, 20minute quarters instead of 40minute halves, and replacing the scrum with the line out

That'll make for an exiting game....

I can only assume that was a tongue in cheek post

Funny though

havent you got better things to be doing Barry? you promised us all you had left.

For the last time.

I'm not Barry Mackenzie.

Not so much a new rule, but trying to trim out some of the interpretations we have at the moment which require the referee to judge whether something was intentional or not, i.e. the knock on involved in the tackle, charge downs etc.

You are doing a very good impression. Maybe it should point you in the direction of changing your behaviour if people are confusing you for that prizeprick

The momentum rule!

Hull fc to be penalised every time luaki (how ever u spell it) does a stupid tackle lol in all serious though a proply fed scrum direct in the middle like it used to be

There isn't one!
There is a "relativity" rule though.

Get rid of the new rule stating that an attacker cannot be dragged into touch. Great in theory, but there has been some real dodgy decisions regarding it.

Because they're rubbish, and don't know what offside is...